[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <254318.1606051984@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2020 13:33:04 +0000
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-block <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/29] iov_iter: Switch to using a table of operations
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> - I worry a bit about the indirect call overhead and spectre v2.
I don't know enough about how spectre v2 works to say if this would be a
problem for the ops-table approach, but wouldn't it also affect the chain of
conditional branches that we currently use, since it's branch-prediction
based?
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists