[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <160605644301.9003.16302947389602369819.tglx@nanos>
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2020 14:47:23 -0000
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: [GIT pull] locking/urgent for v5.10-rc5
Linus,
please pull the latest locking/urgent branch from:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git locking-urgent-2020-11-22
up to: 43be4388e94b: lockdep: Put graph lock/unlock under lock_recursion protection
A single fix for lockdep which makes the recursion protection cover graph
lock/unlock.
Thanks,
tglx
------------------>
Boqun Feng (1):
lockdep: Put graph lock/unlock under lock_recursion protection
kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
index d9fb9e19d2ed..c1418b47f625 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
@@ -108,19 +108,21 @@ static inline void lockdep_lock(void)
{
DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!irqs_disabled());
+ __this_cpu_inc(lockdep_recursion);
arch_spin_lock(&__lock);
__owner = current;
- __this_cpu_inc(lockdep_recursion);
}
static inline void lockdep_unlock(void)
{
+ DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!irqs_disabled());
+
if (debug_locks && DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(__owner != current))
return;
- __this_cpu_dec(lockdep_recursion);
__owner = NULL;
arch_spin_unlock(&__lock);
+ __this_cpu_dec(lockdep_recursion);
}
static inline bool lockdep_assert_locked(void)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists