linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.9 32/47] xfs: revert "xfs: fix rmap key and record comparison functions"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20201123121807.107263523@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 23 Nov 2020 13:22:18 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...deen.net>,
        "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
        Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 32/47] xfs: revert "xfs: fix rmap key and record comparison functions"

From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@...cle.com>

[ Upstream commit eb8409071a1d47e3593cfe077107ac46853182ab ]

This reverts commit 6ff646b2ceb0eec916101877f38da0b73e3a5b7f.

Your maintainer committed a major braino in the rmap code by adding the
attr fork, bmbt, and unwritten extent usage bits into rmap record key
comparisons.  While XFS uses the usage bits *in the rmap records* for
cross-referencing metadata in xfs_scrub and xfs_repair, it only needs
the owner and offset information to distinguish between reverse mappings
of the same physical extent into the data fork of a file at multiple
offsets.  The other bits are not important for key comparisons for index
lookups, and never have been.

Eric Sandeen reports that this causes regressions in generic/299, so
undo this patch before it does more damage.

Reported-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...deen.net>
Fixes: 6ff646b2ceb0 ("xfs: fix rmap key and record comparison functions")
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_rmap_btree.c | 16 ++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_rmap_btree.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_rmap_btree.c
index c5a24b80c7f72..33a28efc3085b 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_rmap_btree.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_rmap_btree.c
@@ -262,8 +262,8 @@ xfs_rmapbt_key_diff(
 	else if (y > x)
 		return -1;
 
-	x = be64_to_cpu(kp->rm_offset);
-	y = xfs_rmap_irec_offset_pack(rec);
+	x = XFS_RMAP_OFF(be64_to_cpu(kp->rm_offset));
+	y = rec->rm_offset;
 	if (x > y)
 		return 1;
 	else if (y > x)
@@ -294,8 +294,8 @@ xfs_rmapbt_diff_two_keys(
 	else if (y > x)
 		return -1;
 
-	x = be64_to_cpu(kp1->rm_offset);
-	y = be64_to_cpu(kp2->rm_offset);
+	x = XFS_RMAP_OFF(be64_to_cpu(kp1->rm_offset));
+	y = XFS_RMAP_OFF(be64_to_cpu(kp2->rm_offset));
 	if (x > y)
 		return 1;
 	else if (y > x)
@@ -401,8 +401,8 @@ xfs_rmapbt_keys_inorder(
 		return 1;
 	else if (a > b)
 		return 0;
-	a = be64_to_cpu(k1->rmap.rm_offset);
-	b = be64_to_cpu(k2->rmap.rm_offset);
+	a = XFS_RMAP_OFF(be64_to_cpu(k1->rmap.rm_offset));
+	b = XFS_RMAP_OFF(be64_to_cpu(k2->rmap.rm_offset));
 	if (a <= b)
 		return 1;
 	return 0;
@@ -431,8 +431,8 @@ xfs_rmapbt_recs_inorder(
 		return 1;
 	else if (a > b)
 		return 0;
-	a = be64_to_cpu(r1->rmap.rm_offset);
-	b = be64_to_cpu(r2->rmap.rm_offset);
+	a = XFS_RMAP_OFF(be64_to_cpu(r1->rmap.rm_offset));
+	b = XFS_RMAP_OFF(be64_to_cpu(r2->rmap.rm_offset));
 	if (a <= b)
 		return 1;
 	return 0;
-- 
2.27.0