Message-Id: <20201123121822.053682010@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 23 Nov 2020 13:21:12 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Arvind Sankar <nivedita@...m.mit.edu>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.4 044/158] compiler.h: fix barrier_data() on clang

From: Arvind Sankar <nivedita@...m.mit.edu>

[ Upstream commit 3347acc6fcd4ee71ad18a9ff9d9dac176b517329 ]

Commit 815f0ddb346c ("include/linux/compiler*.h: make compiler-*.h
mutually exclusive") neglected to copy barrier_data() from
compiler-gcc.h into compiler-clang.h.

The definition in compiler-gcc.h was really to work around clang's more
aggressive optimization, so this broke barrier_data() on clang, and
consequently memzero_explicit() as well.

For example, this results in at least the memzero_explicit() call in
lib/crypto/sha256.c:sha256_transform() being optimized away by clang.

Fix this by moving the definition of barrier_data() into compiler.h.

Also move the gcc/clang definition of barrier() into compiler.h,
__memory_barrier() is icc-specific (and barrier() is already defined
using it in compiler-intel.h) and doesn't belong in compiler.h.

[rdunlap@...radead.org: fix ALPHA builds when SMP is not enabled]

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201101231835.4589-1-rdunlap@infradead.org
Fixes: 815f0ddb346c ("include/linux/compiler*.h: make compiler-*.h mutually exclusive")
Signed-off-by: Arvind Sankar <nivedita@...m.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Tested-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201014212631.207844-1-nivedita@alum.mit.edu
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 include/linux/compiler-clang.h |  5 -----
 include/linux/compiler-gcc.h   | 19 -------------------
 include/linux/compiler.h       | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/compiler-clang.h b/include/linux/compiler-clang.h
index 333a6695a918c..9b89141604ed0 100644
--- a/include/linux/compiler-clang.h
+++ b/include/linux/compiler-clang.h
@@ -37,8 +37,3 @@
 #define COMPILER_HAS_GENERIC_BUILTIN_OVERFLOW 1
 #endif
 
-/* The following are for compatibility with GCC, from compiler-gcc.h,
- * and may be redefined here because they should not be shared with other
- * compilers, like ICC.
- */
-#define barrier() __asm__ __volatile__("" : : : "memory")
diff --git a/include/linux/compiler-gcc.h b/include/linux/compiler-gcc.h
index e8579412ad214..d8fab3ecf5120 100644
--- a/include/linux/compiler-gcc.h
+++ b/include/linux/compiler-gcc.h
@@ -14,25 +14,6 @@
 # error Sorry, your compiler is too old - please upgrade it.
 #endif
 
-/* Optimization barrier */
-
-/* The "volatile" is due to gcc bugs */
-#define barrier() __asm__ __volatile__("": : :"memory")
-/*
- * This version is i.e. to prevent dead stores elimination on @ptr
- * where gcc and llvm may behave differently when otherwise using
- * normal barrier(): while gcc behavior gets along with a normal
- * barrier(), llvm needs an explicit input variable to be assumed
- * clobbered. The issue is as follows: while the inline asm might
- * access any memory it wants, the compiler could have fit all of
- * @ptr into memory registers instead, and since @ptr never escaped
- * from that, it proved that the inline asm wasn't touching any of
- * it. This version works well with both compilers, i.e. we're telling
- * the compiler that the inline asm absolutely may see the contents
- * of @ptr. See also: https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=15495
- */
-#define barrier_data(ptr) __asm__ __volatile__("": :"r"(ptr) :"memory")
-
 /*
  * This macro obfuscates arithmetic on a variable address so that gcc
  * shouldn't recognize the original var, and make assumptions about it.
diff --git a/include/linux/compiler.h b/include/linux/compiler.h
index 448c91bf543b7..f164a9b12813f 100644
--- a/include/linux/compiler.h
+++ b/include/linux/compiler.h
@@ -80,11 +80,25 @@ void ftrace_likely_update(struct ftrace_likely_data *f, int val,
 
 /* Optimization barrier */
 #ifndef barrier
-# define barrier() __memory_barrier()
+/* The "volatile" is due to gcc bugs */
+# define barrier() __asm__ __volatile__("": : :"memory")
 #endif
 
 #ifndef barrier_data
-# define barrier_data(ptr) barrier()
+/*
+ * This version is i.e. to prevent dead stores elimination on @ptr
+ * where gcc and llvm may behave differently when otherwise using
+ * normal barrier(): while gcc behavior gets along with a normal
+ * barrier(), llvm needs an explicit input variable to be assumed
+ * clobbered. The issue is as follows: while the inline asm might
+ * access any memory it wants, the compiler could have fit all of
+ * @ptr into memory registers instead, and since @ptr never escaped
+ * from that, it proved that the inline asm wasn't touching any of
+ * it. This version works well with both compilers, i.e. we're telling
+ * the compiler that the inline asm absolutely may see the contents
+ * of @ptr. See also: https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=15495
+ */
+# define barrier_data(ptr) __asm__ __volatile__("": :"r"(ptr) :"memory")
 #endif
 
 /* workaround for GCC PR82365 if needed */
-- 
2.27.0

Powered by blists - more mailing lists