[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87o8jo5go3.wl-maz@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 13:47:08 +0000
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To: David Brazdil <dbrazdil@...gle.com>
Cc: kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@...il.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Dennis Zhou <dennis@...nel.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Quentin Perret <qperret@...gle.com>,
Andrew Scull <ascull@...gle.com>,
Andrew Walbran <qwandor@...gle.com>, kernel-team@...roid.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/24] psci: Accessor for configured PSCI function IDs
On Mon, 16 Nov 2020 20:42:56 +0000,
David Brazdil <dbrazdil@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> Function IDs used by PSCI are configurable for v0.1 via DT/APCI. If the
> host is using PSCI v0.1, KVM's host PSCI proxy needs to use the same IDs.
> Expose the array holding the information with a read-only accessor.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Brazdil <dbrazdil@...gle.com>
> ---
> drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c | 14 ++++++--------
> include/linux/psci.h | 10 ++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c b/drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c
> index 213c68418a65..d835f3d8b121 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c
> @@ -58,16 +58,14 @@ typedef unsigned long (psci_fn)(unsigned long, unsigned long,
> unsigned long, unsigned long);
> static psci_fn *invoke_psci_fn;
>
> -enum psci_function {
> - PSCI_FN_CPU_SUSPEND,
> - PSCI_FN_CPU_ON,
> - PSCI_FN_CPU_OFF,
> - PSCI_FN_MIGRATE,
> - PSCI_FN_MAX,
> -};
> -
> static u32 psci_function_id[PSCI_FN_MAX];
>
> +u32 psci_get_function_id(enum psci_function fn)
> +{
> + WARN_ON(fn >= PSCI_FN_MAX);
If we are going to warn on something that is out of bounds, maybe we
shouldn't perform the access at all? And maybe check for lower bound
as well?
> + return psci_function_id[fn];
> +}
> +
> #define PSCI_0_2_POWER_STATE_MASK \
> (PSCI_0_2_POWER_STATE_ID_MASK | \
> PSCI_0_2_POWER_STATE_TYPE_MASK | \
> diff --git a/include/linux/psci.h b/include/linux/psci.h
> index 2a1bfb890e58..5b49a5c82d6f 100644
> --- a/include/linux/psci.h
> +++ b/include/linux/psci.h
> @@ -21,6 +21,16 @@ bool psci_power_state_is_valid(u32 state);
> int psci_set_osi_mode(bool enable);
> bool psci_has_osi_support(void);
>
> +enum psci_function {
> + PSCI_FN_CPU_SUSPEND,
> + PSCI_FN_CPU_ON,
> + PSCI_FN_CPU_OFF,
> + PSCI_FN_MIGRATE,
> + PSCI_FN_MAX,
> +};
> +
> +u32 psci_get_function_id(enum psci_function fn);
> +
> struct psci_operations {
> u32 (*get_version)(void);
> int (*cpu_suspend)(u32 state, unsigned long entry_point);
> --
> 2.29.2.299.gdc1121823c-goog
>
>
Thanks,
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists