[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201123151438.258314-1-john.wanghui@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 15:14:38 +0000
From: Wang Hui <john.wanghui@...wei.com>
To: <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>, <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
<alexandre.torgue@...com>,
<linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] hwtracing: stm: fix return value of error branch in stm_heartbeat_init
ret would be reset by stm_source_register_device after first loop, so we
should reassign ret while allocation failed for
stm_heartbeat[i].data.name
Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@...wei.com>
Fixes: 119291853038 ("stm class: Add heartbeat stm source device")
Signed-off-by: Wang Hui <john.wanghui@...wei.com>
---
drivers/hwtracing/stm/heartbeat.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/stm/heartbeat.c b/drivers/hwtracing/stm/heartbeat.c
index 3e7df1c0477f..81d7b21d31ec 100644
--- a/drivers/hwtracing/stm/heartbeat.c
+++ b/drivers/hwtracing/stm/heartbeat.c
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ static void stm_heartbeat_unlink(struct stm_source_data *data)
static int stm_heartbeat_init(void)
{
- int i, ret = -ENOMEM;
+ int i, ret;
if (nr_devs < 0 || nr_devs > STM_HEARTBEAT_MAX)
return -EINVAL;
@@ -72,8 +72,10 @@ static int stm_heartbeat_init(void)
for (i = 0; i < nr_devs; i++) {
stm_heartbeat[i].data.name =
kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "heartbeat.%d", i);
- if (!stm_heartbeat[i].data.name)
+ if (!stm_heartbeat[i].data.name) {
+ ret = -ENOMEM;
goto fail_unregister;
+ }
stm_heartbeat[i].data.nr_chans = 1;
stm_heartbeat[i].data.link = stm_heartbeat_link;
--
2.29.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists