[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201123152720.GA2177956@elver.google.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 16:27:20 +0100
From: Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
kasan-dev <kasan-dev@...glegroups.com>, rcu@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kfence: Avoid stalling work queue task without
allocations
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 02:27PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 13:53:57 +0100
> Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> > Running tests again, along with the function tracer
> > Running tests on all trace events:
> > Testing all events:
> > BUG: workqueue lockup - pool cpus=0 node=0 flags=0x0 nice=0 stuck for 12s!
>
> The below patch might be noisy, but can you add it to the kernel that
> crashes and see if a particular event causes the issue?
>
> [ note I didn't even compile test. I hope it works ;) ]
>
> Perhaps run it a couple of times to see if it crashes on the same set of
> events each time.
Thanks! I have attached the logs of 2 runs. I think one problem here is
that the enabling of an event doesn't immediately trigger the problem,
so it's hard to say which one caused it.
Thanks,
-- Marco
Download attachment "dmesg-1.xz" of type "application/x-xz" (36892 bytes)
Download attachment "dmesg-2.xz" of type "application/x-xz" (35088 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists