| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 00:00:26 +0800
From: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>
To: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>,
Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
kernel-team@...roid.com, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, 0day robot <lkp@...el.com>,
lkp@...ts.01.org, ying.huang@...el.com, feng.tang@...el.com,
zhengjun.xing@...el.com
Subject: [driver core] 95f755a4ef: will-it-scale.per_process_ops 2.2%
improvement
Greeting,
FYI, we noticed a 2.2% improvement of will-it-scale.per_process_ops due to commit:
commit: 95f755a4ef7b9ccbedf6012b4112a990120b6a6c ("[PATCH v2 16/17] driver core: Refactor fw_devlink feature")
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Saravana-Kannan/Refactor-fw_devlink-to-significantly-improve-boot-time/20201121-100850
base: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git linux-next
in testcase: will-it-scale
on test machine: 192 threads Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 9242 CPU @ 2.30GHz with 192G memory
with following parameters:
nr_task: 50%
mode: process
test: futex3
cpufreq_governor: performance
ucode: 0x5003003
test-description: Will It Scale takes a testcase and runs it from 1 through to n parallel copies to see if the testcase will scale. It builds both a process and threads based test in order to see any differences between the two.
test-url: https://github.com/antonblanchard/will-it-scale
In addition to that, the commit also has significant impact on the following tests:
+------------------+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| testcase: change | will-it-scale: will-it-scale.per_process_ops 5.2% improvement |
| test machine | 192 threads Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 9242 CPU @ 2.30GHz with 192G memory |
| test parameters | cpufreq_governor=performance |
| | mode=process |
| | nr_task=50% |
| | test=dup1 |
| | ucode=0x5003003 |
+------------------+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Details are as below:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->
To reproduce:
git clone https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests.git
cd lkp-tests
bin/lkp install job.yaml # job file is attached in this email
bin/lkp run job.yaml
=========================================================================================
compiler/cpufreq_governor/kconfig/mode/nr_task/rootfs/tbox_group/test/testcase/ucode:
gcc-9/performance/x86_64-rhel-8.3/process/50%/debian-10.4-x86_64-20200603.cgz/lkp-csl-2ap2/futex3/will-it-scale/0x5003003
commit:
03b7843215 ("efi: Update implementation of add_links() to create fwnode links")
95f755a4ef ("driver core: Refactor fw_devlink feature")
03b7843215575338 95f755a4ef7b9ccbedf6012b411
---------------- ---------------------------
%stddev %change %stddev
\ | \
10181734 +2.2% 10402895 will-it-scale.per_process_ops
9.774e+08 +2.2% 9.987e+08 will-it-scale.workload
13832427 ± 6% -10.8% 12342804 ± 4% meminfo.DirectMap2M
2454 -5.0% 2332 ± 2% vmstat.system.cs
16233 ± 29% +172.3% 44205 ± 33% numa-vmstat.node0.nr_anon_pages
17076 ± 33% +162.3% 44793 ± 35% numa-vmstat.node0.nr_inactive_anon
17076 ± 33% +162.3% 44793 ± 35% numa-vmstat.node0.nr_zone_inactive_anon
23545 ± 69% +388.7% 115074 ± 36% numa-meminfo.node0.AnonHugePages
64841 ± 29% +172.6% 176742 ± 33% numa-meminfo.node0.AnonPages
68213 ± 33% +162.6% 179095 ± 35% numa-meminfo.node0.Inactive
68213 ± 33% +162.6% 179095 ± 35% numa-meminfo.node0.Inactive(anon)
4.38 ± 10% -2.5 1.87 ± 8% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.syscall_enter_from_user_mode.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe.syscall
4.61 ± 9% -2.7 1.88 ± 8% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.syscall_enter_from_user_mode
0.46 ± 11% -0.2 0.24 ± 9% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__x86_indirect_thunk_rax
4.44 ± 10% -2.7 1.71 ± 8% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.syscall_enter_from_user_mode
2.00 ± 9% +0.6 2.63 ± 8% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.do_futex
2.52 ± 10% +0.8 3.37 ± 9% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.__x64_sys_futex
70868 ± 13% +21.5% 86124 sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.exec_clock.avg
125411 ± 10% +17.9% 147892 sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.exec_clock.max
7286186 ± 12% +21.3% 8840402 sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.min_vruntime.avg
12873032 ± 10% +17.7% 15149207 sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.min_vruntime.max
0.80 ± 13% +29.9% 1.04 ± 9% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.nr_spread_over.avg
-828241 +84.1% -1524980 sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.spread0.min
7478 ± 5% +9.6% 8199 sched_debug.cpu.curr->pid.max
21364 ± 19% +41.9% 30320 ± 23% sched_debug.cpu.ttwu_count.max
1997 ± 14% +27.8% 2552 ± 15% sched_debug.cpu.ttwu_count.stddev
6.451e+10 +2.3% 6.597e+10 perf-stat.i.branch-instructions
4.942e+08 +2.3% 5.054e+08 perf-stat.i.branch-misses
13.97 ± 2% -1.0 13.00 ± 3% perf-stat.i.cache-miss-rate%
1429864 ± 3% -8.8% 1303388 ± 4% perf-stat.i.cache-misses
2410 -5.2% 2285 ± 3% perf-stat.i.context-switches
0.71 -2.6% 0.69 perf-stat.i.cpi
229727 ± 2% +9.8% 252139 ± 4% perf-stat.i.cycles-between-cache-misses
1.062e+11 +2.3% 1.087e+11 perf-stat.i.dTLB-loads
127892 +1.6% 129886 perf-stat.i.dTLB-store-misses
8.09e+10 +2.2% 8.272e+10 perf-stat.i.dTLB-stores
4259891 ± 2% -4.0% 4089092 perf-stat.i.iTLB-loads
4.208e+11 +2.3% 4.303e+11 perf-stat.i.instructions
1.42 +2.2% 1.45 perf-stat.i.ipc
0.65 +3.1% 0.67 perf-stat.i.major-faults
1.33 +3.6% 1.38 perf-stat.i.metric.K/sec
1310 +2.3% 1340 perf-stat.i.metric.M/sec
14.08 ± 2% -1.2 12.92 ± 3% perf-stat.overall.cache-miss-rate%
0.70 -2.1% 0.69 perf-stat.overall.cpi
205608 ± 3% +10.0% 226168 ± 4% perf-stat.overall.cycles-between-cache-misses
1.42 +2.2% 1.45 perf-stat.overall.ipc
6.429e+10 +2.3% 6.574e+10 perf-stat.ps.branch-instructions
4.925e+08 +2.3% 5.037e+08 perf-stat.ps.branch-misses
1439249 ± 3% -8.9% 1310558 ± 4% perf-stat.ps.cache-misses
2401 -5.3% 2274 ± 3% perf-stat.ps.context-switches
1.059e+11 +2.3% 1.083e+11 perf-stat.ps.dTLB-loads
127806 +1.7% 129943 perf-stat.ps.dTLB-store-misses
8.062e+10 +2.2% 8.243e+10 perf-stat.ps.dTLB-stores
4246454 ± 2% -4.1% 4074221 perf-stat.ps.iTLB-loads
4.193e+11 +2.3% 4.288e+11 perf-stat.ps.instructions
32095 ± 2% -6.6% 29971 ± 5% perf-stat.ps.node-loads
1.27e+14 +2.1% 1.297e+14 perf-stat.total.instructions
2251 ± 13% -25.6% 1674 ± 16% interrupts.CPU100.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
4823 ± 46% +34.3% 6475 ± 35% interrupts.CPU105.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts
4823 ± 46% +34.3% 6475 ± 35% interrupts.CPU105.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts
7063 ± 15% -47.6% 3704 ± 47% interrupts.CPU11.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts
7063 ± 15% -47.6% 3704 ± 47% interrupts.CPU11.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts
1743 ± 6% +29.0% 2249 ± 22% interrupts.CPU126.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
6249 ± 6% -41.3% 3670 ± 14% interrupts.CPU130.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts
6249 ± 6% -41.3% 3670 ± 14% interrupts.CPU130.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts
7215 ± 17% -42.5% 4148 ± 60% interrupts.CPU137.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts
7215 ± 17% -42.5% 4148 ± 60% interrupts.CPU137.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts
235.50 ± 19% -77.8% 52.25 ± 91% interrupts.CPU144.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
5653 ± 37% -50.4% 2803 ± 33% interrupts.CPU146.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts
5653 ± 37% -50.4% 2803 ± 33% interrupts.CPU146.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts
6894 ± 16% -50.3% 3426 ± 22% interrupts.CPU147.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts
6894 ± 16% -50.3% 3426 ± 22% interrupts.CPU147.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts
6768 ± 20% -57.4% 2886 ± 36% interrupts.CPU149.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts
6768 ± 20% -57.4% 2886 ± 36% interrupts.CPU149.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts
6750 ± 19% -36.7% 4274 ± 24% interrupts.CPU15.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts
6750 ± 19% -36.7% 4274 ± 24% interrupts.CPU15.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts
74.75 ± 95% +181.6% 210.50 ± 32% interrupts.CPU157.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
3955 ± 41% +114.3% 8474 ± 5% interrupts.CPU159.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts
3955 ± 41% +114.3% 8474 ± 5% interrupts.CPU159.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts
157.00 ± 50% -82.0% 28.25 ± 83% interrupts.CPU161.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
6259 ± 11% -42.8% 3579 ± 34% interrupts.CPU183.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts
6259 ± 11% -42.8% 3579 ± 34% interrupts.CPU183.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts
354.50 ± 77% -87.2% 45.50 ±120% interrupts.CPU2.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
5070 ± 35% +54.3% 7821 ± 14% interrupts.CPU26.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts
5070 ± 35% +54.3% 7821 ± 14% interrupts.CPU26.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts
158.75 ± 38% +74.3% 276.75 ± 15% interrupts.CPU35.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
7163 ± 21% -49.6% 3608 ± 35% interrupts.CPU44.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts
7163 ± 21% -49.6% 3608 ± 35% interrupts.CPU44.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts
57.75 ± 74% +329.4% 248.00 ± 16% interrupts.CPU48.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
5295 ± 16% +61.1% 8529 ± 3% interrupts.CPU5.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts
5295 ± 16% +61.1% 8529 ± 3% interrupts.CPU5.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts
7999 ± 16% -53.7% 3703 ± 47% interrupts.CPU60.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts
7999 ± 16% -53.7% 3703 ± 47% interrupts.CPU60.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts
6556 ± 23% -47.6% 3432 ± 10% interrupts.CPU61.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts
6556 ± 23% -47.6% 3432 ± 10% interrupts.CPU61.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts
238.00 ± 27% -63.0% 88.00 ± 80% interrupts.CPU61.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
7585 ± 10% -49.1% 3863 ± 30% interrupts.CPU63.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts
7585 ± 10% -49.1% 3863 ± 30% interrupts.CPU63.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts
216.25 ± 21% -73.6% 57.00 ±133% interrupts.CPU63.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
138.25 ± 56% +90.2% 263.00 ± 10% interrupts.CPU65.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
241.25 ± 31% -56.7% 104.50 ± 96% interrupts.CPU66.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
7553 ± 15% -47.0% 4004 ± 40% interrupts.CPU76.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts
7553 ± 15% -47.0% 4004 ± 40% interrupts.CPU76.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts
4934 ± 52% +71.1% 8442 ± 2% interrupts.CPU92.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts
4934 ± 52% +71.1% 8442 ± 2% interrupts.CPU92.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts
194.00 ± 30% +47.9% 287.00 interrupts.CPU92.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
23725 ± 8% -27.8% 17131 ± 18% softirqs.CPU1.RCU
23137 ± 12% -31.2% 15917 ± 24% softirqs.CPU101.RCU
21338 ± 16% -28.2% 15329 ± 22% softirqs.CPU104.RCU
18202 ± 7% -17.2% 15064 ± 18% softirqs.CPU112.RCU
21059 ± 18% -26.8% 15417 ± 10% softirqs.CPU113.RCU
21006 ± 17% -30.8% 14529 ± 14% softirqs.CPU115.RCU
27815 ± 36% -33.3% 18546 ± 57% softirqs.CPU121.SCHED
20978 ± 19% -22.2% 16329 ± 27% softirqs.CPU124.RCU
19729 ± 12% -23.7% 15060 ± 14% softirqs.CPU125.RCU
22706 ± 15% -27.8% 16382 ± 12% softirqs.CPU126.RCU
22705 ± 12% -25.4% 16931 ± 27% softirqs.CPU127.RCU
20037 ± 19% -28.2% 14387 ± 12% softirqs.CPU128.RCU
19573 ± 12% -22.8% 15111 ± 4% softirqs.CPU129.RCU
20596 ± 10% -30.9% 14242 ± 14% softirqs.CPU131.RCU
23440 ± 33% +46.3% 34297 ± 9% softirqs.CPU131.SCHED
19106 ± 16% -23.1% 14700 ± 15% softirqs.CPU132.RCU
22821 ± 11% -26.4% 16795 ± 8% softirqs.CPU138.RCU
23505 ± 11% -32.3% 15917 ± 20% softirqs.CPU14.RCU
22836 ± 9% -16.7% 19023 ± 14% softirqs.CPU141.RCU
21767 ± 14% -30.6% 15105 ± 19% softirqs.CPU143.RCU
19267 ± 46% +67.2% 32223 ± 14% softirqs.CPU143.SCHED
24861 ± 4% -41.0% 14660 ± 11% softirqs.CPU144.RCU
11831 ± 47% +177.8% 32871 ± 15% softirqs.CPU144.SCHED
23297 ± 9% -27.0% 17004 ± 6% softirqs.CPU147.RCU
22685 ± 13% -31.4% 15567 ± 18% softirqs.CPU149.RCU
23209 ± 10% -25.8% 17228 ± 8% softirqs.CPU15.RCU
33035 ± 24% -54.6% 15002 ± 56% softirqs.CPU157.SCHED
28385 ± 25% -63.2% 10448 ± 79% softirqs.CPU159.SCHED
20067 ± 7% -12.1% 17638 ± 9% softirqs.CPU160.RCU
22261 ± 14% -35.7% 14306 ± 6% softirqs.CPU161.RCU
20998 ± 43% +67.5% 35179 ± 11% softirqs.CPU161.SCHED
32659 ± 28% -51.0% 16004 ± 66% softirqs.CPU162.SCHED
23692 ± 12% -19.1% 19177 ± 7% softirqs.CPU166.RCU
23350 ± 7% -26.6% 17139 ± 22% softirqs.CPU170.RCU
21357 ± 8% -35.5% 13779 ± 10% softirqs.CPU174.RCU
21886 ± 5% -33.4% 14582 ± 11% softirqs.CPU175.RCU
26609 ± 3% -27.8% 19208 ± 24% softirqs.CPU18.RCU
19898 ± 12% -27.4% 14443 ± 9% softirqs.CPU180.RCU
23109 ± 9% -32.2% 15658 ± 23% softirqs.CPU186.RCU
19719 ± 18% -36.6% 12500 ± 11% softirqs.CPU188.RCU
21919 ± 16% -33.2% 14647 ± 17% softirqs.CPU2.RCU
25187 ± 11% -23.3% 19313 ± 26% softirqs.CPU20.RCU
23983 ± 15% -20.6% 19041 ± 17% softirqs.CPU21.RCU
24148 ± 14% -17.8% 19849 ± 21% softirqs.CPU22.RCU
24732 ± 9% -25.8% 18348 ± 24% softirqs.CPU24.RCU
23282 ± 14% -27.6% 16851 ± 15% softirqs.CPU25.RCU
20694 ± 34% -54.3% 9460 ± 29% softirqs.CPU35.SCHED
25058 ± 13% -27.9% 18059 ± 18% softirqs.CPU4.RCU
20413 ± 18% -28.2% 14659 ± 8% softirqs.CPU43.RCU
23803 ± 17% -32.8% 15994 ± 19% softirqs.CPU44.RCU
24249 ± 11% -22.1% 18886 ± 22% softirqs.CPU46.RCU
32235 ± 14% -65.5% 11106 ± 51% softirqs.CPU48.SCHED
28803 ± 16% -39.1% 17536 ± 30% softirqs.CPU60.RCU
26565 ± 10% -34.4% 17436 ± 22% softirqs.CPU61.RCU
11142 ± 68% +156.3% 28562 ± 24% softirqs.CPU61.SCHED
25175 ± 12% -37.0% 15853 ± 9% softirqs.CPU63.RCU
14961 ± 56% +120.3% 32955 ± 26% softirqs.CPU63.SCHED
23043 ± 39% -62.7% 8602 ± 36% softirqs.CPU65.SCHED
26792 ± 12% -35.8% 17210 ± 14% softirqs.CPU66.RCU
19766 ± 18% -29.6% 13906 ± 9% softirqs.CPU7.RCU
22073 ± 13% -24.4% 16678 ± 23% softirqs.CPU70.RCU
24267 ± 4% -25.3% 18121 ± 19% softirqs.CPU75.RCU
27057 ± 23% -56.9% 11669 ± 75% softirqs.CPU78.SCHED
23392 ± 9% -32.1% 15885 ± 3% softirqs.CPU81.RCU
21645 ± 11% -26.5% 15910 ± 11% softirqs.CPU83.RCU
23556 ± 8% -30.1% 16475 ± 8% softirqs.CPU85.RCU
10105 ± 53% +102.5% 20466 ± 28% softirqs.CPU85.SCHED
24799 ± 15% -27.3% 18022 ± 9% softirqs.CPU88.RCU
19697 ± 58% -71.0% 5715 ± 7% softirqs.CPU92.SCHED
22778 ± 6% -24.3% 17235 ± 15% softirqs.CPU93.RCU
18189 ± 13% -24.4% 13760 ± 10% softirqs.CPU95.RCU
26156 ± 2% -21.7% 20485 ± 13% softirqs.CPU96.RCU
21904 ± 45% -56.8% 9452 ± 57% softirqs.CPU98.SCHED
22162 ± 11% -27.8% 15992 ± 9% softirqs.CPU99.RCU
38457 ± 10% -32.2% 26084 ± 35% softirqs.NET_RX
4109730 -18.0% 3370902 ± 12% softirqs.RCU
47247 ± 4% -20.1% 37765 ± 15% softirqs.TIMER
will-it-scale.per_process_ops
1.045e+07 +---------------------------------------------------------------+
| O O O |
1.04e+07 |-+ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O |
| O O O O O O O O O O O O |
1.035e+07 |-+ |
| |
1.03e+07 |-+ |
| |
1.025e+07 |-+ |
| |
1.02e+07 |-+ +.+..+.+ .+. |
| + + .+.+..+.+.+.+ +.+.|
1.015e+07 |.+.+.+.+.+ +. .+.+.+.+.+. .+.+.+.+ |
| + + + |
1.01e+07 +---------------------------------------------------------------+
will-it-scale.workload
1.005e+09 +---------------------------------------------------------------+
| |
1e+09 |-O O O O O O O O O O |
| O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O |
9.95e+08 |-+ O O O O |
| |
9.9e+08 |-+ |
| |
9.85e+08 |-+ |
| |
9.8e+08 |-+ +. .+.+ |
| : +. + +.+..+.+.+.+.+.+.+.|
9.75e+08 |.+.+.+.+. : +. .+.+.+. .+. .+.+.+. + |
| + + + + + + |
9.7e+08 +---------------------------------------------------------------+
[*] bisect-good sample
[O] bisect-bad sample
***************************************************************************************************
lkp-csl-2ap2: 192 threads Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 9242 CPU @ 2.30GHz with 192G memory
=========================================================================================
compiler/cpufreq_governor/kconfig/mode/nr_task/rootfs/tbox_group/test/testcase/ucode:
gcc-9/performance/x86_64-rhel-8.3/process/50%/debian-10.4-x86_64-20200603.cgz/lkp-csl-2ap2/dup1/will-it-scale/0x5003003
commit:
03b7843215 ("efi: Update implementation of add_links() to create fwnode links")
95f755a4ef ("driver core: Refactor fw_devlink feature")
03b7843215575338 95f755a4ef7b9ccbedf6012b411
---------------- ---------------------------
%stddev %change %stddev
\ | \
4681240 +5.2% 4925857 will-it-scale.per_process_ops
4.494e+08 +5.2% 4.729e+08 will-it-scale.workload
84205 ± 3% -6.6% 78620 ± 2% cpuidle.POLL.time
12.74 +1.4 14.10 mpstat.cpu.all.usr%
38.69 ± 9% +593.5% 268.33 ±101% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.exec_clock.min
12.00 +8.3% 13.00 vmstat.cpu.us
2342 -1.8% 2299 vmstat.system.cs
1416 ± 4% -9.2% 1287 ± 4% slabinfo.dmaengine-unmap-16.active_objs
1416 ± 4% -9.2% 1287 ± 4% slabinfo.dmaengine-unmap-16.num_objs
6896 ± 4% -10.3% 6185 ± 4% slabinfo.kmalloc-rcl-64.active_objs
6896 ± 4% -10.3% 6185 ± 4% slabinfo.kmalloc-rcl-64.num_objs
2118 ± 2% -13.9% 1824 ± 6% slabinfo.kmalloc-rcl-96.active_objs
2118 ± 2% -13.9% 1824 ± 6% slabinfo.kmalloc-rcl-96.num_objs
13476 ± 4% -12.9% 11741 ± 3% slabinfo.pde_opener.active_objs
13476 ± 4% -12.9% 11741 ± 3% slabinfo.pde_opener.num_objs
2637 ± 63% -81.3% 492.50 ±142% numa-meminfo.node0.Active
2637 ± 63% -81.3% 492.50 ±142% numa-meminfo.node0.Active(anon)
2915 ± 16% -47.8% 1520 ± 19% numa-meminfo.node0.PageTables
87880 ± 10% -20.2% 70124 ± 9% numa-meminfo.node0.SUnreclaim
2153 ± 42% +215.9% 6802 ± 64% numa-meminfo.node2.Shmem
39060 ± 53% +306.7% 158860 ± 45% numa-meminfo.node3.AnonPages
46215 ± 44% +256.0% 164519 ± 42% numa-meminfo.node3.Inactive
46215 ± 44% +256.0% 164519 ± 42% numa-meminfo.node3.Inactive(anon)
750282 ± 10% +20.7% 905405 ± 13% numa-meminfo.node3.MemUsed
658.50 ± 63% -81.4% 122.75 ±142% numa-vmstat.node0.nr_active_anon
728.00 ± 15% -47.9% 379.50 ± 19% numa-vmstat.node0.nr_page_table_pages
21969 ± 10% -20.2% 17530 ± 9% numa-vmstat.node0.nr_slab_unreclaimable
658.50 ± 63% -81.4% 122.75 ±142% numa-vmstat.node0.nr_zone_active_anon
621492 ± 13% -26.7% 455253 ± 16% numa-vmstat.node0.numa_hit
572512 ± 17% -31.5% 391888 ± 15% numa-vmstat.node0.numa_local
538.00 ± 42% +216.0% 1700 ± 64% numa-vmstat.node2.nr_shmem
9760 ± 53% +307.2% 39747 ± 45% numa-vmstat.node3.nr_anon_pages
11513 ± 43% +257.5% 41166 ± 42% numa-vmstat.node3.nr_inactive_anon
11513 ± 43% +257.5% 41166 ± 42% numa-vmstat.node3.nr_zone_inactive_anon
548959 ± 19% +33.0% 730071 ± 31% numa-vmstat.node3.numa_hit
427995 ± 25% +47.7% 632173 ± 36% numa-vmstat.node3.numa_local
2.37 ± 8% -1.5 0.88 ± 8% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.syscall_enter_from_user_mode.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe.__close
2.33 ± 8% -1.5 0.88 ± 8% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.syscall_enter_from_user_mode.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe.dup
0.47 ± 57% +0.3 0.74 ± 7% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.locks_remove_posix.filp_close.__x64_sys_close.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe
1.27 ± 7% +0.7 1.96 ± 8% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.syscall_return_via_sysret.__close
4.94 ± 8% -3.2 1.77 ± 8% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.syscall_enter_from_user_mode
0.44 ± 8% -0.2 0.23 ± 8% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__x86_indirect_thunk_rax
0.12 ± 18% -0.0 0.08 ± 13% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.clockevents_program_event
0.11 ± 18% -0.0 0.07 ± 15% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.ktime_get
0.27 ± 4% +0.1 0.33 ± 18% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.start_kernel
4.76 ± 8% -3.1 1.62 ± 8% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.syscall_enter_from_user_mode
1.15 ± 7% -0.5 0.67 ± 8% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.__x64_sys_close
1.44 ± 9% -0.4 1.05 ± 9% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.__x64_sys_dup
0.11 ± 21% -0.0 0.07 ± 13% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.ktime_get
0.09 ± 8% +0.0 0.11 ± 4% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.rcu_read_unlock_strict
9492 ± 72% -65.5% 3272 ±142% softirqs.CPU10.NET_RX
11789 ± 6% +25.7% 14823 ± 11% softirqs.CPU100.RCU
13884 ± 12% +26.5% 17565 ± 9% softirqs.CPU124.RCU
31918 ± 27% -65.9% 10876 ± 41% softirqs.CPU124.SCHED
15884 ± 11% +22.0% 19382 ± 11% softirqs.CPU13.RCU
30930 ± 28% -48.0% 16070 ± 72% softirqs.CPU132.SCHED
17573 ± 6% +77.1% 31116 ± 23% softirqs.CPU170.SCHED
16544 ± 4% -11.4% 14650 ± 10% softirqs.CPU185.RCU
17192 ± 8% -18.7% 13986 ± 16% softirqs.CPU186.RCU
10342 ± 45% +148.7% 25727 ± 27% softirqs.CPU186.SCHED
18559 ± 11% -22.9% 14300 ± 8% softirqs.CPU2.RCU
11714 ± 45% +150.5% 29341 ± 30% softirqs.CPU2.SCHED
21025 ± 46% -47.9% 10949 ± 77% softirqs.CPU21.SCHED
17639 ± 6% -20.2% 14081 ± 9% softirqs.CPU28.RCU
12427 ± 76% +146.2% 30597 ± 22% softirqs.CPU28.SCHED
5236 ± 6% +242.8% 17948 ± 41% softirqs.CPU4.SCHED
12934 ± 56% +139.0% 30910 ± 17% softirqs.CPU57.SCHED
14047 ± 6% +24.2% 17447 ± 8% softirqs.CPU74.RCU
27112 ± 3% -57.2% 11605 ± 70% softirqs.CPU74.SCHED
14231 ± 13% +15.8% 16478 ± 7% softirqs.CPU79.RCU
12191 ± 4% +28.2% 15634 ± 6% softirqs.CPU90.RCU
33498 ± 11% -47.3% 17657 ± 47% softirqs.CPU90.SCHED
13451 ± 5% +27.0% 17079 ± 13% softirqs.CPU98.RCU
33555 ± 15% -59.5% 13587 ± 56% softirqs.CPU98.SCHED
6.427e+10 +5.1% 6.752e+10 perf-stat.i.branch-instructions
0.90 -0.0 0.88 perf-stat.i.branch-miss-rate%
5.739e+08 +3.4% 5.933e+08 perf-stat.i.branch-misses
2298 -1.8% 2257 perf-stat.i.context-switches
0.88 -5.2% 0.84 perf-stat.i.cpi
1.067e+11 +5.1% 1.121e+11 perf-stat.i.dTLB-loads
110648 +8.9% 120538 perf-stat.i.dTLB-store-misses
7.223e+10 +5.1% 7.591e+10 perf-stat.i.dTLB-stores
6.072e+08 +5.4% 6.401e+08 ± 4% perf-stat.i.iTLB-load-misses
3.356e+11 +5.1% 3.526e+11 perf-stat.i.instructions
1.13 +5.5% 1.19 perf-stat.i.ipc
1.24 ± 2% +7.5% 1.34 ± 3% perf-stat.i.metric.K/sec
1266 +5.1% 1331 perf-stat.i.metric.M/sec
0.03 -3.5% 0.03 perf-stat.overall.MPKI
0.89 -0.0 0.88 perf-stat.overall.branch-miss-rate%
0.88 -5.2% 0.84 perf-stat.overall.cpi
0.00 +0.0 0.00 perf-stat.overall.dTLB-store-miss-rate%
1.13 +5.5% 1.19 perf-stat.overall.ipc
6.405e+10 +5.1% 6.729e+10 perf-stat.ps.branch-instructions
5.719e+08 +3.4% 5.913e+08 perf-stat.ps.branch-misses
2287 -1.8% 2247 perf-stat.ps.context-switches
1.063e+11 +5.1% 1.117e+11 perf-stat.ps.dTLB-loads
110749 +8.7% 120431 perf-stat.ps.dTLB-store-misses
7.199e+10 +5.1% 7.565e+10 perf-stat.ps.dTLB-stores
6.049e+08 +5.4% 6.376e+08 ± 4% perf-stat.ps.iTLB-load-misses
3.345e+11 +5.1% 3.514e+11 perf-stat.ps.instructions
1.013e+14 +5.2% 1.065e+14 perf-stat.total.instructions
18582 ± 74% -66.5% 6229 ±146% interrupts.31:PCI-MSI.524289-edge.eth0-TxRx-0
18582 ± 74% -66.5% 6229 ±146% interrupts.CPU10.31:PCI-MSI.524289-edge.eth0-TxRx-0
2285 ± 40% -27.5% 1655 ± 5% interrupts.CPU103.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
150.00 ± 56% -67.2% 49.25 ±138% interrupts.CPU117.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
2.00 ± 86% +8587.5% 173.75 ±168% interrupts.CPU123.TLB:TLB_shootdowns
73.00 ±101% +229.5% 240.50 ± 19% interrupts.CPU124.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
3375 ± 23% +112.2% 7163 ± 20% interrupts.CPU129.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts
3375 ± 23% +112.2% 7163 ± 20% interrupts.CPU129.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts
2570 ± 19% +131.1% 5940 ± 34% interrupts.CPU132.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts
2570 ± 19% +131.1% 5940 ± 34% interrupts.CPU132.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts
382.50 ± 68% -78.6% 82.00 ±136% interrupts.CPU15.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
8363 ± 5% -33.8% 5539 ± 25% interrupts.CPU161.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts
8363 ± 5% -33.8% 5539 ± 25% interrupts.CPU161.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts
253.00 ± 15% -54.0% 116.50 ± 57% interrupts.CPU186.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
249.50 ± 16% -64.7% 88.00 ± 64% interrupts.CPU2.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
4404 ± 25% +89.1% 8327 ± 6% interrupts.CPU21.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts
4404 ± 25% +89.1% 8327 ± 6% interrupts.CPU21.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts
3516 ± 52% -52.8% 1659 ± 5% interrupts.CPU30.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
8180 ± 9% -42.4% 4710 ± 59% interrupts.CPU33.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts
8180 ± 9% -42.4% 4710 ± 59% interrupts.CPU33.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts
8601 ± 2% -39.4% 5208 ± 39% interrupts.CPU36.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts
8601 ± 2% -39.4% 5208 ± 39% interrupts.CPU36.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts
222.75 ± 31% -55.4% 99.25 ±109% interrupts.CPU36.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
291.75 -40.1% 174.75 ± 38% interrupts.CPU4.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
7518 ± 17% -30.1% 5251 ± 42% interrupts.CPU66.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts
7518 ± 17% -30.1% 5251 ± 42% interrupts.CPU66.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts
8034 ± 12% -41.4% 4711 ± 26% interrupts.CPU75.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts
8034 ± 12% -41.4% 4711 ± 26% interrupts.CPU75.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts
52.50 ± 70% +263.8% 191.00 ± 37% interrupts.CPU90.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
63.25 ± 65% +243.1% 217.00 ± 34% interrupts.CPU98.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
Disclaimer:
Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided
for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software
design or configuration may affect actual performance.
Thanks,
Oliver Sang
View attachment "config-5.10.0-rc4-00075-g95f755a4ef7b" of type "text/plain" (170133 bytes)
View attachment "job-script" of type "text/plain" (7957 bytes)
View attachment "job.yaml" of type "text/plain" (5306 bytes)
View attachment "reproduce" of type "text/plain" (338 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists