lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bef922f7-f9c9-de6f-dd3c-9a0d22581edc@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 23 Nov 2020 18:59:01 +0300
From:   Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...il.com>
To:     Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@...ndi.org>,
        kieran.bingham+renesas@...asonboard.com,
        laurent.pinchart+renesas@...asonboard.com,
        niklas.soderlund+renesas@...natech.se, geert@...ux-m68k.org
Cc:     linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] media: max9271: Fix GPIO enable/disable

On 11/20/20 7:15 PM, Jacopo Mondi wrote:

> Fix GPIO enable/disable operations which wrongly read the 0x0f register
> to obtain the current mask of the enabled lines instead of using
> the correct 0x0e register.
> 
> Also fix access to bit 0 of the register which is marked as reserved.
> 
> Fixes: 34009bffc1c6 ("media: i2c: Add RDACM20 driver")
> Signed-off-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@...ndi.org>
> ---
>  drivers/media/i2c/max9271.c | 8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/max9271.c b/drivers/media/i2c/max9271.c
> index 0f6f7a092a46..c247db569bab 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/i2c/max9271.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/max9271.c
> @@ -223,12 +223,12 @@ int max9271_enable_gpios(struct max9271_device *dev, u8 gpio_mask)
>  {
>  	int ret;
>  
> -	ret = max9271_read(dev, 0x0f);
> +	ret = max9271_read(dev, 0x0e);
>  	if (ret < 0)
>  		return 0;
>  
>  	/* BIT(0) reserved: GPO is always enabled. */
> -	ret |= gpio_mask | BIT(0);
> +	ret |= (gpio_mask & ~BIT(0));

   () hardly needed here, = and <op>= have very low prio...

[...]

MBR, Sergei

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ