linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Asoc: qcom: Fix enabling BCLK and LRCLK in LPAIF invalid state

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201123165124.GI6322@sirena.org.uk>
Date:   Mon, 23 Nov 2020 16:51:24 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu <srivasam@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     agross@...nel.org, bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, lgirdwood@...il.com,
        robh+dt@...nel.org, plai@...eaurora.org, bgoswami@...eaurora.org,
        perex@...ex.cz, tiwai@...e.com, srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org,
        rohitkr@...eaurora.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        alsa-devel@...a-project.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        V Sujith Kumar Reddy <vsujithk@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Asoc: qcom: Fix enabling BCLK and LRCLK in LPAIF invalid
 state

On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 09:47:53PM +0530, Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu wrote:
> Fix enabling BCLK and LRCLK only when LPAIF is invalid state and
> bit clock in enable state.

Please submit patches using subject lines reflecting the style for the
subsystem, this makes it easier for people to identify relevant patches.
Look at what existing commits in the area you're changing are doing and
make sure your subject lines visually resemble what they're doing.
There's no need to resubmit to fix this alone.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)