[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201123173008.GK6322@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 17:30:08 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, sudeep.holla@....com,
lukasz.luba@....com, james.quinlan@...adcom.com,
Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com, robh@...nel.org,
satyakim@....qualcomm.com, etienne.carriere@...aro.org,
f.fainelli@...il.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
souvik.chakravarty@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/5] dt-bindings: arm: add support for SCMI Regulators
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 07:10:50PM +0000, Cristian Marussi wrote:
> +This binding uses the common regulator binding[6] but, due to SCMI abstractions,
> +supports only a subset of its properties as specified below amongst Optional
> +properties.
> +Required properties:
> + - reg : shall identify an existent SCMI Voltage Domain.
> +Optional properties:
> + - regulator-name
> + - regulator-min-microvolt / regulator-max-microvolt
> + - regulator-always-on / regulator-boot-on
> + - regulator-max-step-microvolt
> + - regulator-coupled-with / regulator-coupled-max-spread
Please send a followup patch removing this stuff about only specific
properties being supported, that's just asking for bitrot and is equally
true for most regulator drivers - people shouldn't have to do do an
audit of every single regulator driver to add a generic feature.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists