[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201123175052.GA20279@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 18:50:53 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
criu@...nvz.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
Jann Horn <jann@...jh.net>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Daniel P . Berrangé <berrange@...hat.com>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>,
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...merspace.com>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...hat.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/24] exec: Simplify unshare_files
I'll try to actually read this series tomorrow but I see nothing wrong
after the quick glance.
Just one off-topic question,
On 11/20, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>
> --- a/fs/coredump.c
> +++ b/fs/coredump.c
> @@ -585,7 +585,6 @@ void do_coredump(const kernel_siginfo_t *siginfo)
> int ispipe;
> size_t *argv = NULL;
> int argc = 0;
> - struct files_struct *displaced;
> /* require nonrelative corefile path and be extra careful */
> bool need_suid_safe = false;
> bool core_dumped = false;
> @@ -791,11 +790,9 @@ void do_coredump(const kernel_siginfo_t *siginfo)
> }
>
> /* get us an unshared descriptor table; almost always a no-op */
> - retval = unshare_files(&displaced);
> + retval = unshare_files();
Can anyone explain why does do_coredump() need unshare_files() at all?
Oleg.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists