[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201123061734.mpmkdxzullrh52o7@vireshk-i7>
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 11:47:34 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Georgi Djakov <georgi.djakov@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>,
MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
Mikko Perttunen <cyndis@...si.fi>,
Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>,
Peter Geis <pgwipeout@...il.com>,
Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart@...il.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 00/19] Introduce memory interconnect for NVIDIA Tegra
SoCs
On 23-11-20, 03:27, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> This series brings initial support for memory interconnect to Tegra20,
> Tegra30 and Tegra124 SoCs.
>
> For the starter only display controllers and devfreq devices are getting
> interconnect API support, others could be supported later on. The display
> controllers have the biggest demand for interconnect API right now because
> dynamic memory frequency scaling can't be done safely without taking into
> account bandwidth requirement from the displays. In particular this series
> fixes distorted display output on T30 Ouya and T124 TK1 devices.
>
> Changelog:
>
> v10 - In a longer run it will be much nicer if we could support EMC
> hardware versioning on Tegra20 and it's not late to support it now.
> Hence I added these new patches:
>
> dt-bindings: memory: tegra20: emc: Document opp-supported-hw property
> memory: tegra20: Support hardware versioning and clean up OPP table initialization
>
> - Removed error message from tegra30-devfreq driver about missing OPP
> properties in a device-tree because EMC driver already prints that
> message and it uses OPP API error code instead of checking DT directly,
> which is a more correct way of doing that.
Looks good to me (from OPP APIs usage perspective). Thanks for
continuing with this and fixing all the issues Dmitry.
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists