[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87h7pfn4u3.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 22:25:24 +0100
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [patch V4 4/8] sched: Make migrate_disable/enable() independent of RT
On Mon, Nov 23 2020 at 22:15, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 22 2020 at 15:16, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 1:29 AM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
>> The common case of a CPU switching back and forth between a small
>> number of mms would have no significant overhead.
>
> For CPUs which do not support PCID this sucks, which is everything pre
> Westmere and all of 32bit. Yes, 32bit. If we go there then 32bit has to
> bite the bullet and use the very same mechanism. Not that I care much
> TBH.
Bah, I completely forgot that AMD does not support PCID before Zen3
which is a major showstopper.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists