lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201123144137.16459e9c@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date:   Mon, 23 Nov 2020 14:41:37 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>
Cc:     Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...dia.com>, <roopa@...dia.com>,
        <davem@...emloft.net>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] bridge: mrp: Implement LC mode for MRP

On Mon, 23 Nov 2020 23:31:48 +0100 Horatiu Vultur wrote:
> > The existing structs are only present in net-next as well, so if you
> > don't mind Horatiu it'd be good to follow up and remove the unused ones
> > and move the ones (if any) which are only used by the kernel but not by
> > the user space <-> kernel API communication out of include/uapi.  
> 
> Maybe we don't refer to the same structs, but I could see that they are
> already in net and in Linus' tree. For example the struct
> 'br_mrp_ring_topo_hdr'. Or am I missunderstanding something?

Ah, scratch that, I thought this was HSR, I should have paid more
attention. Nothing we can do about the existing ones, then.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ