[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201123225359.GP21644@embeddedor>
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 16:53:59 -0600
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>
To: boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com
Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@...rix.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 058/141] xen-blkfront: Fix fall-through warnings for Clang
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 04:36:26PM -0500, boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com wrote:
>
> On 11/20/20 1:32 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> > In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix a warning
> > by explicitly adding a break statement instead of letting the code fall
> > through to the next case.
> >
> > Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115
> > Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@...nel.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c b/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c
> > index 48629d3433b4..34b028be78ab 100644
> > --- a/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c
> > +++ b/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c
> > @@ -2462,6 +2462,7 @@ static void blkback_changed(struct xenbus_device *dev,
> > break;
> > if (talk_to_blkback(dev, info))
> > break;
> > + break;
> > case XenbusStateInitialising:
> > case XenbusStateInitialised:
> > case XenbusStateReconfiguring:
>
>
> Reviewed-by Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
>
>
> (for patch 138 as well)
Thank you for both reviews, Boris.
> Although I thought using 'fallthrough' attribute was the more common approach.
I've got it. I will consider that for a future patch.
Thanks
--
Gustavo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists