[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <21826b6d513c4d9ccc795179c1edb0df2361d870.camel@perches.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2020 16:53:58 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Finn Thain <fthain@...egraphics.com.au>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com, linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
tboot-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
devel@...ica.org, amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
MPT-FusionLinux.pdl@...adcom.com, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
ibm-acpi-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org,
ecryptfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
cluster-devel@...hat.com, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
keyrings@...r.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
coreteam@...filter.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org,
linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, patches@...nsource.cirrus.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS tag for cleanup robot
On Mon, 2020-11-23 at 09:33 +1100, Finn Thain wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Nov 2020, Joe Perches wrote:
> > But provably correct conversions IMO _should_ be done and IMO churn
> > considerations should generally have less importance.
[]
> Moreover, the patch review workload for skilled humans is being generated
> by the automation, which is completely backwards: the machine is supposed
> to be helping.
Which is why the provably correct matters.
coccinelle transforms can be, but are not necessarily, provably correct.
The _show transforms done via the sysfs_emit_dev.cocci script are correct
as in commit aa838896d87a ("drivers core: Use sysfs_emit and sysfs_emit_at
for show(device *...) functions")
Worthwhile? A different question, but I think yes as it reduces the
overall question space of the existing other sprintf overrun possibilities.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists