linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1] Bluetooth: hci_qca: Handle spurious wakeup from SoC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 23 Nov 2020 12:49:33 +0100
From:   Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>
To:     Abhishek Pandit-Subedi <abhishekpandit@...omium.org>
Cc:     Venkata Lakshmi Narayana Gubba <gubbaven@...eaurora.org>,
        Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@...il.com>,
        Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Bluez mailing list <linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org>,
        Hemantg <hemantg@...eaurora.org>,
        MSM <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Balakrishna Godavarthi <bgodavar@...eaurora.org>,
        Rocky Liao <rjliao@...eaurora.org>, hbandi@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] Bluetooth: hci_qca: Handle spurious wakeup from SoC

Hi Abhishek,

> I think this code would be simplified by using a delayed_work struct
> instead of a timer.

And I pointed this out before that all the timers should be moved to a delayed_work.

In addition such a complex support for hardware should move towards its own driver solely base on serdev. I am currently getting a bit fed up if I point these things out and the answer, please merge this now and we fix it later. Maybe I need to stop merging things and wait for a proper separate driver for this hardware.

Regards

Marcel