linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 064/141] ACPI: Fix fall-through warnings for Clang

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0hLYWKX__oZdcCY0D20pNqpw8SkiTPOCNOtpqe--QLp4Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 23 Nov 2020 12:43:57 +0100
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To:     "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
        ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 064/141] ACPI: Fix fall-through warnings for Clang

On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 7:34 PM Gustavo A. R. Silva
<gustavoars@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix a warning
> by explicitly adding a break statement instead of letting the code fall
> through to the next case.
>
> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@...nel.org>
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/sbshc.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/sbshc.c b/drivers/acpi/sbshc.c
> index 53c2862c4c75..0b3de0e63633 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/sbshc.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/sbshc.c
> @@ -231,6 +231,7 @@ static int smbus_alarm(void *context)
>                 case ACPI_SBS_BATTERY:
>                         acpi_os_execute(OSL_NOTIFY_HANDLER,
>                                         acpi_smbus_callback, hc);
> +                       break;
>                 default:;

Why don't you simply drop the default case below (it's empty anyway)?

>         }
>         mutex_unlock(&hc->lock);
> --
> 2.27.0
>