linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 0/7] gpio: exar: refactor the driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 23 Nov 2020 13:57:07 +0100
From:   Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>
To:     Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Cc:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/7] gpio: exar: refactor the driver

On 23.11.20 13:12, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> Thanks!On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 1:03 PM Jan Kiszka
> <jan.kiszka@...mens.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 23.11.20 12:38, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 11:42 AM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
>>>>
>>>> I just wanted to convert the driver to using simpler IDA API but ended up
>>>> quickly converting it to using regmap. Unfortunately I don't have the HW
>>>> to test it so marking the patches that introduce functional change as RFT
>>>> and Cc'ing the original author.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Jan!
>>>
>>> Could you give this last version a final spin before I merge it?
>>>
>>
>> [   14.250117] exar_serial 0000:02:00.0: enabling device (0000 -> 0002)
>> [   14.336622] 0000:02:00.0: ttyS2 at MMIO 0x90000000 (irq = 44, base_baud = 7812500) is a XR17V35X
>> [   14.391588] 0000:02:00.0: ttyS3 at MMIO 0x90000400 (irq = 44, base_baud = 7812500) is a XR17V35X
>> [   19.250510] gpio_exar: probe of gpio_exar.1.auto failed with error -22
>>
>> That's "new"...
>>
> 
> And if you change reg_bits from 11 to 16?
> 

16 works. Didn't we have that already?

Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, T RDA IOT
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux