[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87y2iqzogv.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 17:52:48 +0100
From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-api@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dev@...ncontainers.org,
corbet@....net, Carlos O'Donell <carlos@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] syscalls: Document OCI seccomp filter interactions &
workaround
* Christoph Hellwig:
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 03:08:09PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> Do you categorically reject the general advice, or specific instances as
>> well?
>
> All of the above. Really, if people decided to use seccompt to return
> nonsensical error codes we should not work around that in new kernel
> ABIs.
Fair enough, I can work with that. Thanks.
Florian
--
Red Hat GmbH, https://de.redhat.com/ , Registered seat: Grasbrunn,
Commercial register: Amtsgericht Muenchen, HRB 153243,
Managing Directors: Charles Cachera, Brian Klemm, Laurie Krebs, Michael O'Neill
Powered by blists - more mailing lists