[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8235a7217b88bc0192eb387ee2be005d@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 16:56:19 +0000
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: LAK <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Valentin Schneider <Valentin.Schneider@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@...roid.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] genirq: Allow an interrupt to be marked as 'raw'
On 2020-11-24 16:26, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 02:14:45PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> Some interrupts (such as the rescheduling IPI) rely on not going
>> through
>> the irq_enter()/irq_exit() calls. To distinguish such interrupts, add
>> a new IRQ flag that allows the low-level handling code to sidestep the
>> enter()/exit() calls.
>
> Well, not quite. The scheduler_ipi() function is perfectly fine being
> called with irq_enter/irq_exit. As per this very series, that's your
> current reality.
>
> The function just doesn't need it.
Yup, definitely a very bad choice of words here.
/me goes and repaint the commit message.
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists