linux-kernel - Re: [Intel-gfx] [drm/i915/gem] 59dd13ad31: phoronix-test-suite.jxrendermark.RadialGradientPaint.1024x1024.operations_per

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 24 Nov 2020 20:47:52 +0000
From:   Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
To:     Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Oliver Sang <oliver.sang@...el.com>
Cc:     feng.tang@...el.com, tiejun.li@...el.com, frank.du@...el.com,
        guobing.chen@...el.com, jiebin.sun@...el.com, Shuhua.Fan@...el.com,
        Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@...el.com>, fan.zhao@...el.com,
        ying.huang@...el.com, shan.kang@...el.com, zhengjun.xing@...el.com,
        zhengjun.xing@...ux.intel.com, Wenhuan.Huang@...el.com,
        intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, guangli.li@...el.com,
        gengxin.xie@...el.com, ming.a.chen@...el.com, yu.ma@...el.com,
        jessica.ji@...el.com, lkp@...ts.01.org, wangyang.guo@...el.com,
        dapeng1.mi@...el.com, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [drm/i915/gem] 59dd13ad31: phoronix-test-suite.jxrendermark.RadialGradientPaint.1024x1024.operations_per_second -54.0% regression

Quoting Oliver Sang (2020-11-19 07:20:18)
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 04:27:13PM +0200, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Could you add intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org into reports going
> > forward.
> > 
> > Quoting kernel test robot (2020-11-11 17:58:11)
> > > 
> > > Greeting,
> > > 
> > > FYI, we noticed a -54.0% regression of phoronix-test-suite.jxrendermark.RadialGradientPaint.1024x1024.operations_per_second due to commit:
> > 
> > How many runs are there on the bad version to ensure the bisect is
> > repeatable?
> 
> test 4 times.
> zxing@inn:/result/phoronix-test-suite/performance-true-Radial_Gradient_Paint-1024x1024-jxrendermark-1.2.4-ucode=0xd6-monitor=da39a3ee/lkp-cfl-d1/debian-x86_64-phoronix/x86_64-rhel-8.3/gcc-9/59dd13ad310793757e34afa489dd6fc8544fc3da$ grep -r "operations_per_second" */stats.json
> 0/stats.json: "phoronix-test-suite.jxrendermark.RadialGradientPaint.1024x1024.operations_per_second": 4133.487932,
> 1/stats.json: "phoronix-test-suite.jxrendermark.RadialGradientPaint.1024x1024.operations_per_second": 4120.421503,
> 2/stats.json: "phoronix-test-suite.jxrendermark.RadialGradientPaint.1024x1024.operations_per_second": 4188.414835,
> 3/stats.json: "phoronix-test-suite.jxrendermark.RadialGradientPaint.1024x1024.operations_per_second": 4068.549514,

a w/o revert (drm-tip)
b w/ revert
+mB----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|                             ..b                                              |
|                             ..b.aa                                           |
|                             ....a.a                                          |
|                             ....a.a                                          |
|                      b  b  ........a                                         |
|                   b  b  b b......... a                                       |
|                   b  bb bbb...........                                       |
|b               ab bbab.bb.b............ba b a a            ab               a|
|                             |__A__|                                          |
|                             |MA_|                                            |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
    N                Min           Max        Median           Avg        Stddev
a 120          3621.8761     7356.4442     4606.7895     4607.9132     156.17693
b 120          2664.0563     6359.9686     4519.5036     4534.4463     95.471121

The patch is not expected to have any impact on the machine you are testing on.
-Chris