[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKXUXMx599Y6oJ_XBJCNbuFnoU0MzsiFzENhnD3nN6D4tYj+aQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 08:44:30 +0100
From: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: Aditya Srivastava <yashsri421@...il.com>,
linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] checkpatch: add fix and improve warning msg for
Non-standard signature
On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 8:26 AM Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2020-11-24 at 07:54 +0100, Lukas Bulwahn wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 6:33 PM Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
> []
> > Maybe a patch reduced to the very obvious synonyms helps newcomers or
> > people with lousy memory to be reminded that it is called
> > "Co-developed-by:" not "Co-authored-by".
>
> I have no issue with proximity matching for nominally invalid uses.
> I think the method used wasn't great though.
> For trivial spelling defects, levenshtein might work well enough.
>
Yes, that is true. Aditya has actually created two patches, one using
some edit distance to find matches and one using a fixed match for
those cases (the one you see here). Both patches complement each
other. But he has only sent the second patch to you yet.
I guess when the other patch is sent out, it is a much clearer full
picture how this fix option will work.
Lukas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists