[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdZA2od6NfNczeVh4v1D4_UBHrErQLHjyGRXWOVPh9f8hQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 09:27:07 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Maulik Shah <mkshah@...eaurora.org>,
Srinivas Ramana <sramana@...eaurora.org>,
Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@...eaurora.org>,
Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
MSM <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] pinctrl: qcom: Clear possible pending irq when
remuxing GPIOs
On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 1:02 AM Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org> wrote:
> Conceptually, we can envision the input on Qualcomm SoCs to pass
> through a bunch of blocks between coming into the chip and becoming a
> GPIO interrupt.
This looks like really good detective engineering, something
I do myself from time to time.
Bjorn does this look OK to you?
I'm wondering about patch 1/3, does it need to be applied
with the rest?
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists