linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6] swiotlb: Adjust SWIOTBL bounce buffer size for SEV guests.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <EF13C80C-42DC-4B51-8AF8-2C1D3859B490@amd.com>
Date:   Tue, 24 Nov 2020 09:25:06 +0000
From:   "Kalra, Ashish" <Ashish.Kalra@....com>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
CC:     Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
        "hch@....de" <hch@....de>,
        "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>, "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
        "luto@...nel.org" <luto@...nel.org>,
        "peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
        "dave.hansen@...ux-intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux-intel.com>,
        "iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Singh, Brijesh" <brijesh.singh@....com>,
        "Lendacky, Thomas" <Thomas.Lendacky@....com>,
        "Grimm, Jon" <Jon.Grimm@....com>,
        "rientjes@...gle.com" <rientjes@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] swiotlb: Adjust SWIOTBL bounce buffer size for SEV
 guests.



> On Nov 24, 2020, at 3:04 AM, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> wrote:
> 
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 10:56:31PM +0000, Ashish Kalra wrote:
>> As i mentioned earlier, the patch was initially based on using a % of
>> guest memory,
> 
> Can you figure out how much the guest memory is and then allocate a
> percentage?

But what will be the criteria to figure out this percentage?

As I mentioned earlier, this can be made as complicated as possible by adding all kind of heuristics but without any predictable performance gain.

Or it can be kept simple by using a static percentage value.

Thanks,
Ashish

> -- 
> Regards/Gruss,
>    Boris.
> 
> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpeople.kernel.org%2Ftglx%2Fnotes-about-netiquette&amp;data=04%7C01%7Cashish.kalra%40amd.com%7C0766422bcee64d2eb57208d89057f620%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637418054797950694%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&amp;sdata=%2FEFuRGOMOu4BZUkPOd9rxam%2BBA3nXj4tdRFFj3nQ47U%3D&amp;reserved=0