[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPDyKFpwnqORRPcqV30YQ8R+zR+QeJ1aHN3S7Om72UnH+p1uPw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 11:56:53 +0100
From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
To: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] amba: Make the remove callback return void
On Tue, 24 Nov 2020 at 11:33, Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de> wrote:
>
> Most amba drivers return 0 in their remove callback. Together with the
> driver core ignoring the return value anyhow, it doesn't make sense to
> return a value here.
>
> So add a warning to the only driver that could return an error code and
> change the remove prototype to return void, which makes it explicit that
> returning an error value doesn't work as expected. This simplifies changing
> the core remove callback to return void, too.
>
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
[...]
> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-replicator.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-replicator.c
> index 6772f23e5c4b..de71058d131d 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-replicator.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-replicator.c
> @@ -390,7 +390,7 @@ static int dynamic_replicator_probe(struct amba_device *adev,
>
> static int __exit dynamic_replicator_remove(struct amba_device *adev)
Looks like you missed to convert this to void.
> {
> - return replicator_remove(&adev->dev);
> + replicator_remove(&adev->dev);
> }
Other the above, feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
[...]
Kind regards
Uffe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists