linux-kernel - [PATCH 4/5] soundwire: bus: only clear valid DP0 interrupts

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20201124013318.8963-5-yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 24 Nov 2020 09:33:17 +0800
From:   Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com>
To:     alsa-devel@...a-project.org, vkoul@...nel.org
Cc:     vinod.koul@...aro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, jank@...ence.com,
        srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org, rander.wang@...ux.intel.com,
        ranjani.sridharan@...ux.intel.com, hui.wang@...onical.com,
        pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com, sanyog.r.kale@...el.com,
        mengdong.lin@...el.com, bard.liao@...el.com
Subject: [PATCH 4/5] soundwire: bus: only clear valid DP0 interrupts

From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>

We should only access the fields that are relevant for DP0, and never
write to reserved or read-only SDCA_CASCADE fields.

Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <guennadi.liakhovetski@...ux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/soundwire/bus.c | 8 +++++---
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/bus.c b/drivers/soundwire/bus.c
index d6e646521819..f66a804f9b74 100644
--- a/drivers/soundwire/bus.c
+++ b/drivers/soundwire/bus.c
@@ -1280,7 +1280,7 @@ static int sdw_initialize_slave(struct sdw_slave *slave)
 
 static int sdw_handle_dp0_interrupt(struct sdw_slave *slave, u8 *slave_status)
 {
-	u8 clear = 0, impl_int_mask;
+	u8 clear, impl_int_mask;
 	int status, status2, ret, count = 0;
 
 	status = sdw_read(slave, SDW_DP0_INT);
@@ -1291,6 +1291,8 @@ static int sdw_handle_dp0_interrupt(struct sdw_slave *slave, u8 *slave_status)
 	}
 
 	do {
+		clear = status & ~SDW_DP0_INTERRUPTS;
+
 		if (status & SDW_DP0_INT_TEST_FAIL) {
 			dev_err(&slave->dev, "Test fail for port 0\n");
 			clear |= SDW_DP0_INT_TEST_FAIL;
@@ -1319,7 +1321,7 @@ static int sdw_handle_dp0_interrupt(struct sdw_slave *slave, u8 *slave_status)
 			*slave_status = clear;
 		}
 
-		/* clear the interrupt */
+		/* clear the interrupts but don't touch reserved and SDCA_CASCADE fields */
 		ret = sdw_write(slave, SDW_DP0_INT, clear);
 		if (ret < 0) {
 			dev_err(slave->bus->dev,
@@ -1340,7 +1342,7 @@ static int sdw_handle_dp0_interrupt(struct sdw_slave *slave, u8 *slave_status)
 		count++;
 
 		/* we can get alerts while processing so keep retrying */
-	} while (status != 0 && count < SDW_READ_INTR_CLEAR_RETRY);
+	} while ((status & SDW_DP0_INTERRUPTS) && (count < SDW_READ_INTR_CLEAR_RETRY));
 
 	if (count == SDW_READ_INTR_CLEAR_RETRY)
 		dev_warn(slave->bus->dev, "Reached MAX_RETRY on DP0 read\n");
-- 
2.17.1