lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMj1kXFnTtAhs_d0EMsFhfZ=KGZJAsut-gtSEf-9dYC-XhB3Wg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 24 Nov 2020 14:45:04 +0100
From:   Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
To:     David Brazdil <dbrazdil@...gle.com>
Cc:     kvmarm <kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
        James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
        Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@...il.com>,
        Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Andrew Scull <ascull@...gle.com>,
        Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@...roid.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/6] kvm: arm64: Fix up RELA relocations in hyp code/data

On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 at 17:25, David Brazdil <dbrazdil@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> KVM nVHE code runs under a different VA mapping than the kernel, hence
> so far it relied only on PC-relative addressing to avoid accidentally
> using a relocated kernel VA from a constant pool (see hyp_symbol_addr).
>
> So as to reduce the possibility of a programmer error, fixup the
> relocated addresses instead. Let the kernel relocate them to kernel VA
> first, but then iterate over them again, filter those that point to hyp
> code/data and convert the kernel VA to hyp VA.
>
> This is done after kvm_compute_layout and before apply_alternatives.
>

If this is significant enough to call out, please include the reason for it.

> Signed-off-by: David Brazdil <dbrazdil@...gle.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h |  1 +
>  arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c          |  4 +-
>  arch/arm64/kvm/va_layout.c       | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h
> index 5168a0c516ae..e5226f7e4732 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h
> @@ -105,6 +105,7 @@ alternative_cb_end
>  void kvm_update_va_mask(struct alt_instr *alt,
>                         __le32 *origptr, __le32 *updptr, int nr_inst);
>  void kvm_compute_layout(void);
> +void kvm_fixup_hyp_relocations(void);
>
>  static __always_inline unsigned long __kern_hyp_va(unsigned long v)
>  {
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
> index 18e9727d3f64..30241afc2c93 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
> @@ -434,8 +434,10 @@ static void __init hyp_mode_check(void)
>                            "CPU: CPUs started in inconsistent modes");
>         else
>                 pr_info("CPU: All CPU(s) started at EL1\n");
> -       if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KVM))
> +       if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KVM)) {
>                 kvm_compute_layout();
> +               kvm_fixup_hyp_relocations();
> +       }
>  }
>
>  void __init smp_cpus_done(unsigned int max_cpus)
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/va_layout.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/va_layout.c
> index d8cc51bd60bf..b80fab974896 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/va_layout.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/va_layout.c
> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
>  #include <asm/alternative.h>
>  #include <asm/debug-monitors.h>
>  #include <asm/insn.h>
> +#include <asm/kvm_asm.h>
>  #include <asm/kvm_mmu.h>
>  #include <asm/memory.h>
>
> @@ -82,6 +83,81 @@ __init void kvm_compute_layout(void)
>         init_hyp_physvirt_offset();
>  }
>
> +#define __load_elf_u64(s)                                      \
> +       ({                                                      \
> +               extern u64 s;                                   \
> +               u64 val;                                        \
> +                                                               \
> +               asm ("ldr %0, =%1" : "=r"(val) : "S"(&s));      \
> +               val;                                            \
> +       })
> +

Do you need this to ensure that the reference is absolute? There may
be more elegant ways to achieve that, using weak references for
instance.

Also, in the relocation startup code, I deliberately used a 32-bit
quantity here, as it won't get confused for an absolute virtual
address that needs relocation.


> +static bool __is_within_bounds(u64 addr, char *start, char *end)
> +{
> +       return start <= (char*)addr && (char*)addr < end;
> +}
> +
> +static bool __is_in_hyp_section(u64 addr)
> +{
> +       return __is_within_bounds(addr, __hyp_text_start, __hyp_text_end) ||
> +              __is_within_bounds(addr, __hyp_rodata_start, __hyp_rodata_end) ||
> +              __is_within_bounds(addr,
> +                                 CHOOSE_NVHE_SYM(__per_cpu_start),
> +                                 CHOOSE_NVHE_SYM(__per_cpu_end));
> +}
> +

It is slightly disappointing that we need to filter these one by one
like this, but I don't think there are any guarantees about the order
in which the R_AARCH64_RELATIVE entries appear.

> +static void __fixup_hyp_rel(u64 addr)

__init ?

> +{
> +       u64 *ptr, kern_va, hyp_va;
> +
> +       /* Adjust the relocation address taken from ELF for KASLR. */
> +       addr += kaslr_offset();
> +
> +       /* Skip addresses not in any of the hyp sections. */
> +       if (!__is_in_hyp_section(addr))
> +               return;
> +
> +       /* Get the LM alias of the relocation address. */
> +       ptr = (u64*)kvm_ksym_ref((void*)addr);
> +
> +       /*
> +        * Read the value at the relocation address. It has already been
> +        * relocated to the actual kernel kimg VA.
> +        */
> +       kern_va = (u64)kvm_ksym_ref((void*)*ptr);
> +
> +       /* Convert to hyp VA. */
> +       hyp_va = __early_kern_hyp_va(kern_va);
> +
> +       /* Store hyp VA at the relocation address. */
> +       *ptr = __early_kern_hyp_va(kern_va);
> +}
> +
> +static void __fixup_hyp_rela(void)

__init ?

> +{
> +       Elf64_Rela *rel;
> +       size_t i, n;
> +
> +       rel = (Elf64_Rela*)(kimage_vaddr + __load_elf_u64(__rela_offset));
> +       n = __load_elf_u64(__rela_size) / sizeof(*rel);
> +
> +       for (i = 0; i < n; ++i)
> +               __fixup_hyp_rel(rel[i].r_offset);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * The kernel relocated pointers to kernel VA. Iterate over relocations in
> + * the hypervisor ELF sections and convert them to hyp VA. This avoids the
> + * need to only use PC-relative addressing in hyp.
> + */
> +__init void kvm_fixup_hyp_relocations(void)

It is more idiomatic to put the __init after the 'void', and someone
is undoubtedly going to send a patch to 'fix' that if we merge it like
this.

> +{
> +       if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RELOCATABLE) || has_vhe())
> +               return;
> +
> +       __fixup_hyp_rela();
> +}
> +
>  static u32 compute_instruction(int n, u32 rd, u32 rn)
>  {
>         u32 insn = AARCH64_BREAK_FAULT;
> --
> 2.29.2.299.gdc1121823c-goog
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ