linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] net: stmmac: add flexible PPS to dwmac 4.10a

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6d314a48-8d01-5a31-63de-8159e68d665e@pengutronix.de>
Date:   Tue, 24 Nov 2020 15:27:12 +0100
From:   Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@...gutronix.de>
To:     Antonio Borneo <antonio.borneo@...com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        has <has@...gutronix.de>,
        Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
        Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
        Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
        Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: stmmac: add flexible PPS to dwmac 4.10a

To += Jakub's new address

On 24.11.20 15:15, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> Hello Jakub,
> 
> On 10.10.19 00:26, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>> On Mon, 7 Oct 2019 17:43:06 +0200, Antonio Borneo wrote:
>>> All the registers and the functionalities used in the callback
>>> dwmac5_flex_pps_config() are common between dwmac 4.10a [1] and
>>> 5.00a [2].
>>>
>>> Reuse the same callback for dwmac 4.10a too.
>>>
>>> Tested on STM32MP15x, based on dwmac 4.10a.
>>>
>>> [1] DWC Ethernet QoS Databook 4.10a October 2014
>>> [2] DWC Ethernet QoS Databook 5.00a September 2017
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Antonio Borneo <antonio.borneo@...com>
>>
>> Applied to net-next.
> 
> This patch seems to have been fuzzily applied at the wrong location.
> The diff describes extension of dwmac 4.10a and so does the @@ line:
> 
>   @@ -864,6 +864,7 @@ const struct stmmac_ops dwmac410_ops = {
> 
> The patch was applied mainline as 757926247836 ("net: stmmac: add
> flexible PPS to dwmac 4.10a"), but it extends dwmac4_ops instead:
> 
>   @@ -938,6 +938,7 @@ const struct stmmac_ops dwmac4_ops = {
> 
> I don't know if dwmac4 actually supports FlexPPS, so I think it's
> better to be on the safe side and revert 757926247836 and add the
> change for the correct variant.
> 
> Cheers,
> Ahmad
> 
> 

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Steuerwalder Str. 21                       | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany                  | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |