[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201125030119.2864302-26-guro@fb.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 19:01:10 -0800
From: Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>
To: <bpf@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <ast@...nel.org>, <daniel@...earbox.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<andrii@...nel.org>, <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
<linux-mm@...ck.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<kernel-team@...com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v8 25/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for queue_stack_maps maps
Do not use rlimit-based memory accounting for queue_stack maps.
It has been replaced with the memcg-based memory accounting.
Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>
---
kernel/bpf/queue_stack_maps.c | 16 ++++------------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/queue_stack_maps.c b/kernel/bpf/queue_stack_maps.c
index 0ee2347ba510..f9c734aaa990 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/queue_stack_maps.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/queue_stack_maps.c
@@ -66,29 +66,21 @@ static int queue_stack_map_alloc_check(union bpf_attr *attr)
static struct bpf_map *queue_stack_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
{
- int ret, numa_node = bpf_map_attr_numa_node(attr);
- struct bpf_map_memory mem = {0};
+ int numa_node = bpf_map_attr_numa_node(attr);
struct bpf_queue_stack *qs;
- u64 size, queue_size, cost;
+ u64 size, queue_size;
size = (u64) attr->max_entries + 1;
- cost = queue_size = sizeof(*qs) + size * attr->value_size;
-
- ret = bpf_map_charge_init(&mem, cost);
- if (ret < 0)
- return ERR_PTR(ret);
+ queue_size = sizeof(*qs) + size * attr->value_size;
qs = bpf_map_area_alloc(queue_size, numa_node);
- if (!qs) {
- bpf_map_charge_finish(&mem);
+ if (!qs)
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
- }
memset(qs, 0, sizeof(*qs));
bpf_map_init_from_attr(&qs->map, attr);
- bpf_map_charge_move(&qs->map.memory, &mem);
qs->size = size;
raw_spin_lock_init(&qs->lock);
--
2.26.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists