linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] dt-bindings: net: nfc: s3fwrn5: Support a UART interface

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 25 Nov 2020 12:08:38 +0900
From:   Bongsu Jeon <bongsu.jeon2@...il.com>
To:     "krzk@...nel.org" <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc:     Bongsu Jeon <bongsu.jeon@...sung.com>,
        "kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
        "linux-nfc@...ts.01.org" <linux-nfc@...ts.01.org>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] dt-bindings: net: nfc: s3fwrn5: Support a
 UART interface

On 11/24/20, krzk@...nel.org <krzk@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 08:39:40PM +0900, Bongsu Jeon wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 5:02 PM krzk@...nel.org <krzk@...nel.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 04:55:26PM +0900, Bongsu Jeon wrote:
>  > >  examples:
>> > >    - |
>> > >      #include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
>> > > @@ -71,3 +81,17 @@ examples:
>> > >              wake-gpios = <&gpj0 2 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>> > >          };
>> > >      };
>> > > +  # UART example on Raspberry Pi
>> > > +  - |
>> > > +    &uart0 {
>> > > +        status = "okay";
>> > > +
>> > > +        s3fwrn82_uart {
>> >
>> > Just "bluetooth" to follow Devicetree specification.
>> Sorry. I don't understand this comment.
>> Could you explain it?
>> Does it mean i need to refer to the net/broadcom-bluetooth.txt?
>
> The node name should be "bluetooth", not "s3fwrn82_uart", because of
> Devicetree naming convention - node names should represent generic class
> of a device.
>
Actually, RN82 is the nfc device.
So, is it okay to use the name as nfc instead of Bluetooth?

> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
>