lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 25 Nov 2020 14:24:51 +0800
From:   Alex Shi <alex.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>
To:     Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@...il.com>,
        syzbot <syzbot+ce635500093181f39c1c@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        syzkaller-bugs <syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com>,
        Hui Su <sh_def@....com>
Subject: Re: linux-next boot error: WARNING in prepare_kswapd_sleep



在 2020/11/25 上午1:59, Lorenzo Stoakes 写道:
> On Tue, 24 Nov 2020 at 07:54, syzbot
> <syzbot+ce635500093181f39c1c@...kaller.appspotmail.com> wrote:
>> syzbot found the following issue on:
>>
>> HEAD commit:    d9137320 Add linux-next specific files for 20201124
> 
> This appears to be a product of 4b2904f3 ("mm/memcg: add missed
> warning in mem_cgroup_lruvec") adding a VM_WARN_ON_ONCE() to
> mem_cgroup_lruvec, which when invoked from a function other than
> mem_cgroup_page_lruvec() can in fact be called with the condition
> false.
> If we move the check back into mem_cgroup_page_lruvec() it resolves
> the issue. I enclose a simple version of this below, happy to submit
> as a proper patch if this is the right approach:
> 
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> index 87ed56dc75f9..27cc40a490b2 100644
> --- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> +++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> @@ -618,7 +618,6 @@ static inline struct lruvec
> *mem_cgroup_lruvec(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
>                 goto out;
>         }
> 
> -       VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!memcg);
>         if (!memcg)
>                 memcg = root_mem_cgroup;
> 
> @@ -645,6 +644,7 @@ static inline struct lruvec
> *mem_cgroup_lruvec(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
>  static inline struct lruvec *mem_cgroup_page_lruvec(struct page *page,
>                                                 struct pglist_data *pgdat)
>  {
> +       VM_WARN_ON_ONCE_PAGE(!page_memcg(page), page);
>         return mem_cgroup_lruvec(page_memcg(page), pgdat);
>  }
> 

Acked.

Right. Would you like to remove the bad commit 4b2904f3 ("mm/memcg: add missed
 warning in mem_cgroup_lruvec") and replace yours.

and further more, could you like try another patch?

Thanks
Alex

>From 073b222bd06a96c39656b0460c705e48c7eedafc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2020 14:06:33 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] mm/memcg: bail out early when !memcg in mem_cgroup_lruvec

In some scenarios, we call NULL memcg in mem_cgroup_lruvec(NULL, pgdat)
so we could get out early to skip unnecessary check.

Also warning if both parameter are NULL.

Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>
---
 include/linux/memcontrol.h | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
index 3a995bb3157f..5e4da83eb9ce 100644
--- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
+++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
@@ -613,7 +613,9 @@ static inline struct lruvec *mem_cgroup_lruvec(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
 	struct mem_cgroup_per_node *mz;
 	struct lruvec *lruvec;
 
-	if (mem_cgroup_disabled()) {
+	VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!memcg && !pgdat);
+
+	if (mem_cgroup_disabled() || !memcg) {
 		lruvec = &pgdat->__lruvec;
 		goto out;
 	}
-- 
2.29.GIT

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ