[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAFQd5A=kYufStO7ni4j6f+grDpsoigskcj1LdiG9NRN=cvviQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2020 16:32:28 +0900
From: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...omium.org>
To: Bingbu Cao <bingbu.cao@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Robert Foss <robert.foss@...aro.org>,
Dongchun Zhu <dongchun.zhu@...iatek.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
linux-media <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Ben Kao <ben.kao@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] media: ov8856: Remove 3280x2464 mode
Hi Bingbu,
On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 1:15 PM Bingbu Cao <bingbu.cao@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 11/24/20 6:20 PM, Robert Foss wrote:
> > On Tue, 24 Nov 2020 at 10:42, Bingbu Cao <bingbu.cao@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi, Robert
> >>
> >> I remember that the full size of ov8856 image sensor is 3296x2480 and we can get the 3280x2464
> >> frames based on current settings.
> >>
> >> Do you have any issues with this mode?
> >
> > As far as I can tell using the 3280x2464 mode actually yields an
> > output resolution that is 3264x2448.
> >
> > What does your hardware setup look like? And which revision of the
> > sensor are you using?
> >
>
> Robert, the sensor revision I am using is v1.1. I just checked the actual output pixels on our
> hardware, the output resolution with 2464 mode is 3280x2464, no black pixels.
>
> As Tomasz said, some ISP has the requirement of extra pixel padding, From the ov8856 datasheet,
> the central 3264x2448 pixels are *suggested* to be output from the pixel array and the boundary
> pixels can be used for additional processing. In my understanding, the 32 dummy lines are not
> black lines.
The datasheet says that only 3264x2448 are active pixels. What pixel
values are you seeing outside of that central area? In the datasheet,
those look like "optically black" pixels, which are not 100% black,
but rather as if the sensor cells didn't receive any light - noise can
be still there.
Best regards,
Tomasz
Powered by blists - more mailing lists