linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] pwm: pca9685: Support staggered output ON times

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 25 Nov 2020 09:40:01 +0100
From:   Clemens Gruber <clemens.gruber@...ruber.com>
To:     Sven Van Asbroeck <thesven73@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Uwe Kleine-König 
        <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
        David Jander <david@...tonic.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] pwm: pca9685: Support staggered output ON times

On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 10:51:23PM -0500, Sven Van Asbroeck wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 1:10 PM Clemens Gruber
> <clemens.gruber@...ruber.com> wrote:
> >
> > The PCA9685 supports staggered LED output ON times to minimize current
> > surges and reduce EMI.
> > When this new option is enabled, the ON times of each channel are
> > delayed by channel number x counter range / 16, which avoids asserting
> > all enabled outputs at the same counter value while still maintaining
> > the configured duty cycle of each output.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Clemens Gruber <clemens.gruber@...ruber.com>
> > ---
> >
> > Changes since v1:
> > - Rebased
> >
> >  drivers/pwm/pwm-pca9685.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-pca9685.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-pca9685.c
> > index 2b82b35ff0de..37c80bc8edcf 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-pca9685.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-pca9685.c
> > @@ -75,6 +75,7 @@ struct pca9685 {
> >         struct pwm_chip chip;
> >         struct regmap *regmap;
> >         int prescale;
> > +       bool staggered_outputs;
> >  #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_GPIOLIB)
> >         struct mutex lock;
> >         struct gpio_chip gpio;
> > @@ -329,7 +330,7 @@ static int pca9685_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
> >  {
> >         struct pca9685 *pca = to_pca(chip);
> >         unsigned long long duty, prescale;
> > -       unsigned int reg;
> > +       unsigned int on, off, reg;
> >
> >         if (state->polarity != PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL)
> >                 return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > @@ -375,6 +376,32 @@ static int pca9685_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
> >         duty = (PCA9685_COUNTER_RANGE - 1) * state->duty_cycle;
> >         duty = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(duty, state->period);
> >
> > +       if (pca->staggered_outputs) {
> > +               if (pwm->hwpwm < PCA9685_MAXCHAN) {
> > +                       /*
> > +                        * To reduce EMI, the ON times of each channel are
> > +                        * spread out evenly within the counter range, while
> > +                        * still maintaining the configured duty cycle
> > +                        */
> > +                       on = pwm->hwpwm * PCA9685_COUNTER_RANGE /
> > +                               PCA9685_MAXCHAN;
> > +                       off = (on + duty) % PCA9685_COUNTER_RANGE;
> 
> Will pwm_get_state() still return the correct duty cycle in case
> of staggered outputs?

No, but it should. I will improve the get_state function in the next
version to cover all cases.

Thanks for your input. This would have been a mess without your feedback
;)

> 
> > +                       regmap_write(pca->regmap, LED_N_ON_L(pwm->hwpwm),
> > +                                    on & 0xff);
> > +                       regmap_write(pca->regmap, LED_N_ON_H(pwm->hwpwm),
> > +                                    (on >> 8) & 0xf);
> > +                       regmap_write(pca->regmap, LED_N_OFF_L(pwm->hwpwm),
> > +                                    off & 0xff);
> > +                       regmap_write(pca->regmap, LED_N_OFF_H(pwm->hwpwm),
> > +                                    (off >> 8) & 0xf);
> > +                       return 0;
> > +               }
> > +
> > +               /* No staggering possible if "all LEDs" channel is used */
> > +               regmap_write(pca->regmap, PCA9685_ALL_LED_ON_L, 0);
> > +               regmap_write(pca->regmap, PCA9685_ALL_LED_ON_H, 0);
> > +       }
> > +
> >         if (pwm->hwpwm >= PCA9685_MAXCHAN)
> >                 reg = PCA9685_ALL_LED_OFF_L;
> >         else
> > @@ -470,6 +497,9 @@ static int pca9685_pwm_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> >
> >         regmap_write(pca->regmap, PCA9685_MODE2, reg);
> >
> > +       pca->staggered_outputs = device_property_read_bool(
> > +               &client->dev, "staggered-outputs");
> > +
> >         /* Disable all LED ALLCALL and SUBx addresses to avoid bus collisions */
> >         regmap_read(pca->regmap, PCA9685_MODE1, &reg);
> >         reg &= ~(MODE1_ALLCALL | MODE1_SUB1 | MODE1_SUB2 | MODE1_SUB3);
> > @@ -478,6 +508,9 @@ static int pca9685_pwm_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> >         /* Reset OFF registers to HW default (only full OFF bit is set) */
> >         regmap_write(pca->regmap, PCA9685_ALL_LED_OFF_L, 0);
> >         regmap_write(pca->regmap, PCA9685_ALL_LED_OFF_H, LED_FULL);
> > +       /* Reset ON registers to HW default */
> > +       regmap_write(pca->regmap, PCA9685_ALL_LED_ON_L, 0);
> > +       regmap_write(pca->regmap, PCA9685_ALL_LED_ON_H, 0);
> >
> >         pca->chip.ops = &pca9685_pwm_ops;
> >         /* Add an extra channel for ALL_LED */
> > --
> > 2.29.2
> >