[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201124154904.0699f4c1@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 15:49:04 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Andrea Mayer <andrea.mayer@...roma2.it>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Shrijeet Mukherjee <shrijeet@...il.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>,
Stefano Salsano <stefano.salsano@...roma2.it>,
Paolo Lungaroni <paolo.lungaroni@...t.it>,
Ahmed Abdelsalam <ahabdels.dev@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next v3 0/8] seg6: add support for SRv6 End.DT4/DT6
behavior
On Mon, 23 Nov 2020 19:28:48 +0100 Andrea Mayer wrote:
> - Patch 1 is needed to solve a pre-existing issue with tunneled packets
> when a sniffer is attached;
>
> - Patch 2 improves the management of the seg6local attributes used by the
> SRv6 behaviors;
>
> - Patch 3 adds support for optional attributes in SRv6 behaviors;
>
> - Patch 4 introduces two callbacks used for customizing the
> creation/destruction of a SRv6 behavior;
>
> - Patch 5 is the core patch that adds support for the SRv6 End.DT4
> behavior;
>
> - Patch 6 introduces the VRF support for SRv6 End.DT6 behavior;
>
> - Patch 7 adds the selftest for SRv6 End.DT4 behavior;
>
> - Patch 8 adds the selftest for SRv6 End.DT6 (VRF mode) behavior;
>
> - Patch 9 adds the vrftable attribute for End.DT4/DT6 behaviors in iproute2.
LGTM! Please address the nit and repost without the iproute2 patch.
Mixing the iproute2 patch in has confused patchwork:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=389667&state=*
Note how it thinks that the iproute2 patch is part of the kernel
series. This build bot-y thing is pretty new. I'll add a suggestion
to our process documentation not to mix patches.
> I would like to thank David Ahern for his support during the development of
> this patchset.
Should I take this to mean that David has review the code off-list?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists