linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH leds + devicetree v2 2/2] leds: trigger: netdev: parse `trigger-sources` from device tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201125104242.GD25562@amd>
Date:   Wed, 25 Nov 2020 11:42:42 +0100
From:   Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To:     Marek Behún <marek.behun@....cz>
Cc:     linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>,
        Ondřej Jirman <megous@...ous.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Matthias Schiffer <matthias.schiffer@...tq-group.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH leds + devicetree v2 2/2] leds: trigger: netdev: parse
 `trigger-sources` from device tree

Hi!

> Allow setting netdev LED trigger as default when given LED DT node has
> the `trigger-sources` property pointing to a node corresponding to a
> network device.
> 
> The specific netdev trigger mode is determined from the `function` LED
> property.

Sounds reasonable.

> +	netdev = of_find_net_device_by_node(args.np);
> +	if (!netdev)
> +		return false;
> +
> +	np = dev_of_node(led_cdev->dev);
> +	if (!np)
> +		return false;

Missing of_node_put?

> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/leds/common.h
> @@ -77,6 +77,7 @@
>  #define LED_FUNCTION_HEARTBEAT "heartbeat"
>  #define LED_FUNCTION_INDICATOR "indicator"
>  #define LED_FUNCTION_LAN "lan"
> +#define LED_FUNCTION_LINK "link"
>  #define LED_FUNCTION_MAIL "mail"
>  #define LED_FUNCTION_MTD "mtd"
>  #define LED_FUNCTION_PANIC "panic"

We have function "lan" already defined; "link" would do mostly same
thing. Should we use "lan"? Or should we delete "lan" and replace it
with "link"?

Best regards,
								Pavel

-- 
http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (182 bytes)