lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a37ac792b61d4931d0b4d1356e96415e@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 25 Nov 2020 13:33:22 +0000
From:   Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To:     David Brazdil <dbrazdil@...gle.com>
Cc:     kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
        Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@...il.com>,
        Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Dennis Zhou <dennis@...nel.org>,
        Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
        Quentin Perret <qperret@...gle.com>,
        Andrew Scull <ascull@...gle.com>,
        Andrew Walbran <qwandor@...gle.com>, kernel-team@...roid.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/24] arm64: Move MAIR_EL1_SET to asm/memory.h

On 2020-11-25 13:26, David Brazdil wrote:

>> I came up with the following patch on top of this series that seems to
>> compile without issue.
> 
> That seems to have an implicit dependency of sysreg.h on memory.h, 
> doesn't it?
> I had it the other way round initially. I also tried including memory.h 
> in
> sysreg.h. That creates a circular dependency mmdebug.h -> bug.h -> ... 
> ->
> sysreg.h -> memory.h -> mmdebug.h. Pretty annoying. I could try to fix 
> that,
> or create a new header file... :(

I don't think we need this. Any low-level source using MAIR_ELx_SET is 
bound
to require memory.h as well, one way or another. As this is all 
#defines,
it won't break anything unless actively used.

And given that this is used in exactly *two* places, I don't believe 
there
is a need for over-engineering this.

Thanks,

         M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ