[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201125141813.GC2414@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2020 15:18:13 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@...gle.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
linux-riscv <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-csky@...r.kernel.org, Guo Ren <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Michael Clark <michaeljclark@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] riscv: Add QUEUED_SPINLOCKS & QUEUED_RWLOCKS
supported
On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 08:52:23AM +0800, Guo Ren wrote:
> > I'm pretty sure there's a handfull of implementations like this out
> > there... if only we could share.
> Michael has sent qspinlock before, ref to Link below. He reused mips' code.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20190211043829.30096-1-michaeljclark@mac.com/
>
> Which short xchg implementation do you prefer (Mine or his)?
Well, it would be very nice to have mips/riscv/csky all use the same
header to implement these I suppose.
But then we're back to a cmpxchg-loop, in which case Arnd's suggestion
isn't worse.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists