[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0i2RYpw-rxvGWXzetiaSO34EH6x3TN5-O2npZM25Kww7w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2020 16:53:16 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Youling Tang <tangyouling@...ngson.cn>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] acpi: Fix use-after-free in acpi_ipmi.c
On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 1:51 PM Youling Tang <tangyouling@...ngson.cn> wrote:
>
> kfree() has been called inside put_device so anther kfree would cause a
> use-after-free bug.
>
> Signed-off-by: Youling Tang <tangyouling@...ngson.cn>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/acpi_ipmi.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_ipmi.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_ipmi.c
> index 9d6c0fc..72902b6 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_ipmi.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_ipmi.c
> @@ -130,7 +130,6 @@ ipmi_dev_alloc(int iface, struct device *dev, acpi_handle handle)
> ipmi_device, &user);
> if (err) {
> put_device(dev);
> - kfree(ipmi_device);
dev doesn't point to the same object in memory as ipmi_device, though,
if I'm not mistaken.
Please double check that and resend the patch if you are sure that it
is correct.
> return NULL;
> }
> ipmi_device->user_interface = user;
> @@ -142,7 +141,6 @@ static void ipmi_dev_release(struct acpi_ipmi_device *ipmi_device)
> {
> ipmi_destroy_user(ipmi_device->user_interface);
> put_device(ipmi_device->dev);
> - kfree(ipmi_device);
> }
>
> static void ipmi_dev_release_kref(struct kref *kref)
> --
> 2.1.0
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists