[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20201126012726.38f23d18069ec54792fc6276@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 01:27:26 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To: Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
x86@...nel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>,
Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@...cle.com>,
Julien Thierry <jthierry@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/insn: Fix vector instructions decoding on big
endian
On Tue, 24 Nov 2020 14:33:10 +0100
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 11:30:52AM -0600, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 05:09:54PM +0100, Vasily Gorbik wrote:
> > > Running instruction decoder posttest on s390 with allyesconfig shows
> > > errors. Instructions used in couple of kernel objects could not be
> > > correctly decoded on big endian system.
> > >
> > > insn_decoder_test: warning: objdump says 6 bytes, but insn_get_length() says 5
> > > insn_decoder_test: warning: Found an x86 instruction decoder bug, please report this.
> > > insn_decoder_test: warning: ffffffff831eb4e1: 62 d1 fd 48 7f 04 24 vmovdqa64 %zmm0,(%r12)
> > > insn_decoder_test: warning: objdump says 7 bytes, but insn_get_length() says 6
> > > insn_decoder_test: warning: Found an x86 instruction decoder bug, please report this.
> > > insn_decoder_test: warning: ffffffff831eb4e8: 62 51 fd 48 7f 44 24 01 vmovdqa64 %zmm8,0x40(%r12)
> > > insn_decoder_test: warning: objdump says 8 bytes, but insn_get_length() says 6
> > >
> > > This is because in few places instruction field bytes are set directly
> > > with further usage of "value". To address that introduce and use
> > > insn_set_byte() helper, which correctly updates "value" on big endian
> > > systems.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>
> > > ---
> > > Please let me know if this patch is good as it is or I should squash it
> > > into the patch 2 of my patch series and resend it again.
> >
> > It all looks good to me, thanks!
> >
> > Masami, does this patch look good, and also patches 1-2 of the series?
> > (I think you previously ACKed patch 2).
> >
>
> Friendly ping...
Sorry for replying late.
Yes, I think this series and the last patch look good to me.
Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
for this series.
Thank you!
--
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists