[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201125164044.GL2164284@krava>
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2020 17:40:44 +0100
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>
Cc: open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel Team <Kernel-team@...com>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"acme@...nel.org" <acme@...nel.org>,
"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com"
<alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
"namhyung@...nel.org" <namhyung@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/2] perf: support build BPF skeletons with perf
On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 11:52:43PM +0000, Song Liu wrote:
>
>
> > On Nov 22, 2020, at 3:35 PM, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 08:50:45PM -0800, Song Liu wrote:
> >> BPF programs are useful in perf to profile BPF programs. BPF skeleton is
> >> by far the easiest way to write BPF tools. Enable building BPF skeletons
> >> in util/bpf_skel. A dummy bpf skeleton is added. More bpf skeletons will
> >> be added for different use cases.
> >
> > I was just in a place adding bpf program to perf as well,
> > so this will save me some time ;-) thanks!
>
> I'd love to learn about your plan. Maybe we have some similar ideas,
> and could collaborate on them.
the plan was to use skeleton as you did, because I agree it's the best
way to include bpf program in perf
I'm now using your patch and adding my bpf program on top of that ;-)
thanks,
jirka
Powered by blists - more mailing lists