[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2bdcfeaa104a380425faa68a0479534d@codeaurora.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2020 10:01:05 +0800
From: hongwus@...eaurora.org
To: Can Guo <cang@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Bean Huo <huobean@...il.com>, asutoshd@...eaurora.org,
nguyenb@...eaurora.org, ziqichen@...eaurora.org,
rnayak@...eaurora.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...roid.com, saravanak@...gle.com, salyzyn@...gle.com,
Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@...el.com>,
Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>,
Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
Satya Tangirala <satyat@...gle.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
cang=codeaurora.org@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] scsi: ufs: Refector ufshcd_setup_clocks() to
remove skip_ref_clk
On 2020-11-25 08:53, Can Guo wrote:
> On 2020-11-25 05:09, Bean Huo wrote:
>> On Mon, 2020-11-23 at 23:28 -0800, Can Guo wrote:
>>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h
>>> @@ -229,6 +229,8 @@ struct ufs_dev_cmd {
>>> * @max_freq: maximum frequency supported by the clock
>>> * @min_freq: min frequency that can be used for clock scaling
>>> * @curr_freq: indicates the current frequency that it is set to
>>> + * @always_on_while_link_active: indicate that the clk should not be
>>> disabled if
>>> + link is still active
>>> * @enabled: variable to check against multiple enable/disable
>>> */
>>> struct ufs_clk_info {
>>> @@ -238,6 +240,7 @@ struct ufs_clk_info {
>>> u32 max_freq;
>>> u32 min_freq;
>>> u32 curr_freq;
>>> + bool always_on_while_link_active;
>>
>> Can,
>> using a sentence as a parameter name looks a little bit clumsy to me.
>> The meaning has been explained in the comments section. How about
>> simplify it and in line with other parameters in the structure?
>>
>
> Do you have a better name in mind?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Can Guo.
>
>> Thanks,
>> Bean
>>
>>> bool enabled;
>>> };
>>>
Looks good to me. The variable name is not a problem.
Reviewed-by: Hongwu Su<hongwus@...eaurora.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists