linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND PATCH] regulator: core: return zero for selectors lower than linear_min

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <160642116162.9318.1338696690812308259.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 26 Nov 2020 20:06:06 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>, lgirdwood@...il.com
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        jonathanh@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH] regulator: core: return zero for selectors lower than linear_min_sel

On Wed, 25 Nov 2020 19:25:47 +0200, Claudiu Beznea wrote:
> Selectors lower than linear_min_sel should not be considered invalid.
> Thus return zero in case _regulator_list_voltage(),
> regulator_list_hardware_vsel() or regulator_list_voltage_table()
> receives such selectors as argument.

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] regulator: core: return zero for selectors lower than linear_min_sel
      commit: 55cca73931c3a08eb74f5ad06e88304af7a292e0

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark