linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 22/22] xlink-core: factorize xlink_ioctl function by creating sub-functions for each ioctl command

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <X8APikiYF4+C3PjC@kroah.com>
Date:   Thu, 26 Nov 2020 21:26:50 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     mgross@...ux.intel.com
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, adam.r.gretzinger@...el.com,
        markgross@...nel.org, Seamus Kelly <seamus.kelly@...el.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 22/22] xlink-core: factorize xlink_ioctl function by
 creating sub-functions for each ioctl command

On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 10:43:49AM -0800, mgross@...ux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Seamus Kelly <seamus.kelly@...el.com>
> 
> Refactor the too large IOCTL function to call helper functions.
> 
> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> Reviewed-by: Mark Gross <mgross@...ux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Seamus Kelly <seamus.kelly@...el.com>

<snip>

What are these random patch sets that don't seem to be showing up on
lore.kernel.org and I don't get the full series, nor any understanding
what is going on?

Are you sending only partial sets out for some reason?

thanks,

greg k-h