lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <160642644736.15379.9850669928715684163@build.alporthouse.com>
Date:   Thu, 26 Nov 2020 21:34:07 +0000
From:   Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
To:     Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Oliver Sang <oliver.sang@...el.com>,
        Xing Zhengjun <zhengjun.xing@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     feng.tang@...el.com, tiejun.li@...el.com, guangli.li@...el.com,
        frank.du@...el.com, guobing.chen@...el.com, jiebin.sun@...el.com,
        Shuhua.Fan@...el.com, Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@...el.com>,
        fan.zhao@...el.com, ying.huang@...el.com, shan.kang@...el.com,
        zhengjun.xing@...el.com, Wenhuan.Huang@...el.com,
        intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, lkp@...ts.01.org,
        ming.a.chen@...el.com, yu.ma@...el.com, jessica.ji@...el.com,
        dapeng1.mi@...el.com, wangyang.guo@...el.com,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, gengxin.xie@...el.com
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [drm/i915/gem] 59dd13ad31: phoronix-test-suite.jxrendermark.RadialGradientPaint.1024x1024.operations_per_second -54.0% regression

Quoting Xing Zhengjun (2020-11-26 01:44:55)
> 
> 
> On 11/25/2020 4:47 AM, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > Quoting Oliver Sang (2020-11-19 07:20:18)
> >> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 04:27:13PM +0200, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> Could you add intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org into reports going
> >>> forward.
> >>>
> >>> Quoting kernel test robot (2020-11-11 17:58:11)
> >>>>
> >>>> Greeting,
> >>>>
> >>>> FYI, we noticed a -54.0% regression of phoronix-test-suite.jxrendermark.RadialGradientPaint.1024x1024.operations_per_second due to commit:
> >>>
> >>> How many runs are there on the bad version to ensure the bisect is
> >>> repeatable?
> >>
> >> test 4 times.
> >> zxing@inn:/result/phoronix-test-suite/performance-true-Radial_Gradient_Paint-1024x1024-jxrendermark-1.2.4-ucode=0xd6-monitor=da39a3ee/lkp-cfl-d1/debian-x86_64-phoronix/x86_64-rhel-8.3/gcc-9/59dd13ad310793757e34afa489dd6fc8544fc3da$ grep -r "operations_per_second" */stats.json
> >> 0/stats.json: "phoronix-test-suite.jxrendermark.RadialGradientPaint.1024x1024.operations_per_second": 4133.487932,
> >> 1/stats.json: "phoronix-test-suite.jxrendermark.RadialGradientPaint.1024x1024.operations_per_second": 4120.421503,
> >> 2/stats.json: "phoronix-test-suite.jxrendermark.RadialGradientPaint.1024x1024.operations_per_second": 4188.414835,
> >> 3/stats.json: "phoronix-test-suite.jxrendermark.RadialGradientPaint.1024x1024.operations_per_second": 4068.549514,
> > 
> > a w/o revert (drm-tip)
> > b w/ revert
> > +mB----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
> > |                             ..b                                              |
> > |                             ..b.aa                                           |
> > |                             ....a.a                                          |
> > |                             ....a.a                                          |
> > |                      b  b  ........a                                         |
> > |                   b  b  b b......... a                                       |
> > |                   b  bb bbb...........                                       |
> > |b               ab bbab.bb.b............ba b a a            ab               a|
> > |                             |__A__|                                          |
> > |                             |MA_|                                            |
> > +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
> >      N                Min           Max        Median           Avg        Stddev
> > a 120          3621.8761     7356.4442     4606.7895     4607.9132     156.17693
> > b 120          2664.0563     6359.9686     4519.5036     4534.4463     95.471121
> > 
> > The patch is not expected to have any impact on the machine you are testing on.
> > -Chris
> > 
> 
> What's your code base?
> For my side:
> 1) sync the code to the head of Linux mainline
> 2) git reset --hard 59dd13ad31
> 3) git revert 59dd13ad3107
> We compare the test result of commit 59dd13ad3107 (step 2) and 
> 2052847b06f8 (step 3, revert 59dd13ad3107), the regression should 
> related with 59dd13ad3107. Each test case we run 5 times.

a 59dd13ad31
b revert
+mB----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|                        a                                                     |
|                       aa                                                     |
|                     .b....ba                                                 |
|                     .b....baa    b                                           |
|                     .........b . b   b                                       |
|                a   b.......... ..bb  b        b                              |
|              b a   b.............b.a b        b                              |
|a    a  b.    .aaa..b.............b..b....ab   b     a                       .|
|                      |__A__|                                                 |
|                      |___A_____|                                             |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
    N                Min           Max        Median           Avg        Stddev
a 120          3658.3435     6363.7812     4527.4406      4536.612     86.095459
b 120          3928.9643      6375.829     4576.0482     4585.4224      157.284

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ