[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2282897.HYN9I3zZbb@kista>
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2020 00:40:31 +0100
From: Jernej Škrabec <jernej.skrabec@...l.net>
To: mripard@...nel.org, paul.kocialkowski@...tlin.com,
Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@...labora.com>
Cc: mchehab@...nel.org, wens@...e.org, hverkuil@...all.nl,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com,
Emmanuel Gil Peyrot <linkmauve@...kmauve.fr>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH v3] media: cedrus: Add support for VP8 decoding
Hi!
Dne petek, 27. november 2020 ob 00:21:11 CET je Ezequiel Garcia napisal(a):
> Hi Jernej, Emmanuel,
>
> Thanks for the patch.
>
> On Tue, 2020-11-10 at 23:35 +0100, Jernej Skrabec wrote:
> > VP8 in Cedrus shares same engine as H264.
> >
> > Note that it seems necessary to call bitstream parsing functions,
> > to parse frame header, otherwise decoded image is garbage. This is
> > contrary to what is driver supposed to do. However, values are not
> > really used, so this might be acceptable. It's possible that bitstream
> > parsing functions set some internal VPU state, which is later necessary
> > for proper decoding. Biggest suspect is "VP8 probs update" trigger.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...l.net>
> > [addressed issues from reviewer]
> > Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Gil Peyrot <linkmauve@...kmauve.fr>
> > ---
> > Changes in v3:
> > - addressed comments from Ezequiel Garcia - new comments,
> > using new macros from VP8 UAPI, new function for waiting
> > on bit to be set
> > Changes in v2:
> > - rebased on top of current linux-media master branch
> >
> > NOTE: This now depends on following patch:
> > https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/project/linux-media/patch/
20201108202021.4187-1-linkmauve@...kmauve.fr/
> >
>
> The patch looks fairly good, so let's wait and see
> what Hans, Paul and Maxime think about it.
>
> FWIW, my humble Reviewed-by: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@...labora.com>
Thanks!
>
> It would be good to make sure this doesn't regress
> v4l2-compliance, or cause some regression in decoding.
I didn't include v4l2-compliance here, but it was in previous revisions. This
revision has just cosmetics. Not sure how it could cause any regression since
it's pretty standalone.
>
> Not really a blocker to merge this, but I'm thinking
> that now that we have Fluster for conformance testing,
> we could add the VP8 vectors and use them against
> Cedrus and Hantro:
>
> https://chromium.googlesource.com/webm/vp8-test-vectors/+/refs/heads/master
I tested VP8 test vectors with initial version of this decoder by hand and all
videos were properly decoded as far as I can tell. But automated testing is
always welcome.
Best regards,
Jernej
>
> Thanks,
> Ezequiel
>
> > drivers/staging/media/sunxi/cedrus/Makefile | 3 +-
> > drivers/staging/media/sunxi/cedrus/cedrus.c | 8 +
> > drivers/staging/media/sunxi/cedrus/cedrus.h | 24 +
> > .../staging/media/sunxi/cedrus/cedrus_dec.c | 5 +
> > .../staging/media/sunxi/cedrus/cedrus_hw.c | 2 +
> > .../staging/media/sunxi/cedrus/cedrus_regs.h | 80 ++
> > .../staging/media/sunxi/cedrus/cedrus_video.c | 9 +
> > .../staging/media/sunxi/cedrus/cedrus_vp8.c | 907 ++++++++++++++++++
> > 8 files changed, 1037 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > create mode 100644 drivers/staging/media/sunxi/cedrus/cedrus_vp8.c
> >
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists