lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 26 Nov 2020 11:13:54 +0800
From:   Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@...hat.com>
To:     Qinglang Miao <miaoqinglang@...wei.com>
Cc:     Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...deen.net>,
        "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
        linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: check the return value of krealloc() in
 xfs_uuid_mount

On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 11:05:03AM +0800, Qinglang Miao wrote:

...

> > 
> > I'm not sure if Hulk CI is completely broken or not on this, also if
> > such CI can now generate trivial patch (?) since the subject, commit
> > message and even the variable name is quite similiar to
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/20201124104531.561-2-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com
> > in a day.
> > 
> > And it'd be better to look into the code before sending patches...
> Yeah..  I should pay more attension.

Yeah, it'd be better to address/fix the Hulk CI false report
if possible, so it won't have such warning in the future.

Thanks,
Gao Xiang

> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Gao Xiang >
> Thanks for your advice~
> > > 
> > > Thanks for your adviceļ¼
> > > 
> > 
> > .
> > 
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ