linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] xfs: check the return value of krealloc() in xfs_uuid

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201126031354.GA345905@xiangao.remote.csb>
Date:   Thu, 26 Nov 2020 11:13:54 +0800
From:   Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@...hat.com>
To:     Qinglang Miao <miaoqinglang@...wei.com>
Cc:     Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...deen.net>,
        "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
        linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: check the return value of krealloc() in
 xfs_uuid_mount

On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 11:05:03AM +0800, Qinglang Miao wrote:

...

> > 
> > I'm not sure if Hulk CI is completely broken or not on this, also if
> > such CI can now generate trivial patch (?) since the subject, commit
> > message and even the variable name is quite similiar to
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/20201124104531.561-2-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com
> > in a day.
> > 
> > And it'd be better to look into the code before sending patches...
> Yeah..  I should pay more attension.

Yeah, it'd be better to address/fix the Hulk CI false report
if possible, so it won't have such warning in the future.

Thanks,
Gao Xiang

> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Gao Xiang >
> Thanks for your advice~
> > > 
> > > Thanks for your advice！
> > > 
> > 
> > .
> > 
>