[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM9d7ciEGMbtMhr7dLof2VHwiBSHWNr8AbH+RYnsL=z-x5zkdg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 13:49:29 +0900
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Michael Petlan <mpetlan@...hat.com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@...ux.intel.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 22/25] perf buildid-cache: Add support to add build ids
from perf data
On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 1:36 AM Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 10:00:10PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 8:06 AM Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Adding support to specify perf data file as -a option file
> > > argument,
> > >
> > > If the file is detected to be perf data file, it is processed
> > > and all dso objects with sample hit are stored to the build
> > > id cache.
> > >
> > > $ DEBUGINFOD_URLS=http://192.168.122.174:8002 perf buildid-cache -a perf.data
> > > OK 5dcec522abf136fcfd3128f47e131f2365834dd7 /home/jolsa/.debug/.build-id/5d/cec522abf136fcfd3128f47e131f2365834dd7/elf
> > > OK 5784f813b727a50cfd3363234aef9fcbab685cc4 /lib/modules/5.10.0-rc2speed+/kernel/fs/xfs/xfs.ko
> > >
> > > By default we store only dso with hits, but it's possible to
> > > specify 'all' to store all dso objects, like:
> > > -a perf.data,all
> >
> > I think we can add -A/--add-all like we have -p and -P.
>
> hm, the thing is that 'all' is specific for perf data file: '-a perf.data'
> hence -A 'file' would make no sense, only for '-A perf.data', so the current
> 'all' parameter seems less confusing to me
Yeah, I also thought about the '-A perf.data' form.
But I won't insist on it strongly, it's up to you. :)
Thanks,
Namhyung
Powered by blists - more mailing lists