[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6409c32842ab080d91d1851a58f7ec7bb4524336.camel@collabora.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 03:19:24 -0300
From: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@...labora.com>
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>,
Adrian Ratiu <adrian.ratiu@...labora.com>
Cc: linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
Helen Koike <helen.koike@...labora.com>,
Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@...omium.org>,
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>, kernel@...labora.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] char: tpm: add i2c driver for cr50
On Thu, 2020-11-26 at 05:30 +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Tue, 2020-11-24 at 10:14 -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> > Hi Jarkko,
> >
> > Thanks for your review.
> >
> > On Tue, 2020-11-24 at 00:06 +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 07:23:45PM +0200, Adrian Ratiu wrote:
> > > > From: "dlaurie@...omium.org" <dlaurie@...omium.org>
> > > >
> > > > Add TPM 2.0 compatible I2C interface for chips with cr50
> > > > firmware.
> > > >
> > > > The firmware running on the currently supported H1 MCU requires a
> > > > special driver to handle its specific protocol, and this makes it
> > > > unsuitable to use tpm_tis_core_* and instead it must implement
> > > > the
> > > > underlying TPM protocol similar to the other I2C TPM drivers.
> > > >
> > > > - All 4 byes of status register must be read/written at once.
> > > > - FIFO and burst count is limited to 63 and must be drained by
> > > > AP.
> > > > - Provides an interrupt to indicate when read response data is
> > > > ready
> > > > and when the TPM is finished processing write data.
> > > >
> > > > This driver is based on the existing infineon I2C TPM driver,
> > > > which
> > > > most closely matches the cr50 i2c protocol behavior.
> > > >
> > > > Cc: Helen Koike <helen.koike@...labora.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@...omium.org>
> > > > [swboyd@...omium.org: Depend on i2c even if it's a module,
> > > > replace
> > > > boilier plate with SPDX tag, drop asm/byteorder.h include,
> > > > simplify
> > > > return from probe]
> > > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Fabien Lahoudere <fabien.lahoudere@...labora.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Adrian Ratiu <adrian.ratiu@...labora.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > Changes in v2:
> > > > - Various small fixes all over (reorder includes, MAX_BUFSIZE,
> > > > comments, etc)
> > > > - Reworked return values of i2c_wait_tpm_ready() to fix timeout
> > > > mis-handling
> > > > so ret == 0 now means success, the wait period jiffies is ignored
> > > > because that
> > > > number is meaningless and return a proper timeout error in case
> > > > jiffies == 0.
> > > > - Make i2c default to 1 message per transfer (requested by
> > > > Helen)
> > > > - Move -EIO error reporting to transfer function to cleanup
> > > > transfer() itself
> > > > and its R/W callers
> > > > - Remove magic value hardcodings and introduce enum
> > > > force_release.
> > > >
> > > > v1 posted at https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/2/25/349
> > > >
> > > > Applies on next-20201120, tested on Chromebook EVE.
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/char/tpm/Kconfig | 10 +
> > > > drivers/char/tpm/Makefile | 2 +
> > > > drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_i2c_cr50.c | 768
> > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > 3 files changed, 780 insertions(+)
> > > > create mode 100644 drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_i2c_cr50.c
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/Kconfig b/drivers/char/tpm/Kconfig
> > > > index a18c314da211..4308f9ca7a43 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/char/tpm/Kconfig
> > > > +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/Kconfig
> > > > @@ -86,6 +86,16 @@ config TCG_TIS_SYNQUACER
> > > > To compile this driver as a module, choose M here;
> > > > the module will be called tpm_tis_synquacer.
> > > >
> > > > +config TCG_TIS_I2C_CR50
> > > > + tristate "TPM Interface Specification 2.0 Interface (I2C
> > > > - CR50)"
> > > > + depends on I2C
> > > > + select TCG_CR50
> > > > + help
> > > > + This is a driver for the Google cr50 I2C TPM interface
> > > > which is a
> > > > + custom microcontroller and requires a custom i2c
> > > > protocol interface
> > > > + to handle the limitations of the hardware. To compile
> > > > this driver
> > > > + as a module, choose M here; the module will be called
> > > > tcg_tis_i2c_cr50.
> > > > +
> > > > config TCG_TIS_I2C_ATMEL
> > > > tristate "TPM Interface Specification 1.2 Interface (I2C
> > > > - Atmel)"
> > > > depends on I2C
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/Makefile
> > > > b/drivers/char/tpm/Makefile
> > > > index 84db4fb3a9c9..66d39ea6bd10 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/char/tpm/Makefile
> > > > +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/Makefile
> > > > @@ -27,6 +27,8 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_TCG_TIS_SPI) += tpm_tis_spi.o
> > > > tpm_tis_spi-y := tpm_tis_spi_main.o
> > > > tpm_tis_spi-$(CONFIG_TCG_TIS_SPI_CR50) += tpm_tis_spi_cr50.o
> > > >
> > > > +obj-$(CONFIG_TCG_TIS_I2C_CR50) += tpm_tis_i2c_cr50.o
> > > > +
> > > > obj-$(CONFIG_TCG_TIS_I2C_ATMEL) += tpm_i2c_atmel.o
> > > > obj-$(CONFIG_TCG_TIS_I2C_INFINEON) += tpm_i2c_infineon.o
> > > > obj-$(CONFIG_TCG_TIS_I2C_NUVOTON) += tpm_i2c_nuvoton.o
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_i2c_cr50.c
> > > > b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_i2c_cr50.c
> > > > new file mode 100644
> > > > index 000000000000..37555dafdca0
> > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_i2c_cr50.c
> > > > @@ -0,0 +1,768 @@
> > > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > > > +/*
> > > > + * Copyright 2016 Google Inc.
> > > > + *
> > > > + * Based on Linux Kernel TPM driver by
> > > > + * Peter Huewe <peter.huewe@...ineon.com>
> > > > + * Copyright (C) 2011 Infineon Technologies
> > > > + */
> > > > +
> > > > +/*
> > > > + * cr50 is a firmware for H1 secure modules that requires
> > > > special
> > > > + * handling for the I2C interface.
> > > > + *
> > > > + * - Use an interrupt for transaction status instead of
> > > > hardcoded delays
> > > > + * - Must use write+wait+read read protocol
> > > > + * - All 4 bytes of status register must be read/written at once
> > > > + * - Burst count max is 63 bytes, and burst count behaves
> > > > + * slightly differently than other I2C TPMs
> > > > + * - When reading from FIFO the full burstcnt must be read
> > > > + * instead of just reading header and determining the
> > > > remainder
> > > > + */
> > > > +
> > > > +#include <linux/acpi.h>
> > > > +#include <linux/completion.h>
> > > > +#include <linux/i2c.h>
> > > > +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
> > > > +#include <linux/module.h>
> > > > +#include <linux/pm.h>
> > > > +#include <linux/slab.h>
> > > > +#include <linux/wait.h>
> > > > +
> > > > +#include "tpm_tis_core.h"
> > > > +
> > > > +#define CR50_MAX_BUFSIZE 64
> > > > +#define CR50_TIMEOUT_SHORT_MS 2 /* Short timeout during
> > > > transactions */
> > > > +#define CR50_TIMEOUT_NOIRQ_MS 20 /* Timeout for TPM ready
> > > > without IRQ */
> > > > +#define CR50_I2C_DID_VID 0x00281ae0L
> > > > +#define CR50_I2C_MAX_RETRIES 3 /* Max retries due to I2C
> > > > errors */
> > > > +#define CR50_I2C_RETRY_DELAY_LO 55 /* Min usecs
> > > > between retries on I2C */
> > > > +#define CR50_I2C_RETRY_DELAY_HI 65 /* Max usecs
> > > > between retries on I2C */
> > >
> > > CR50_ -> TPM_CR50_
> > >
> > > > +
> > > > +#define TPM_I2C_ACCESS(l) (0x0000 | ((l) << 4))
> > > > +#define TPM_I2C_STS(l) (0x0001 | ((l) << 4))
> > > > +#define TPM_I2C_DATA_FIFO(l) (0x0005 | ((l) << 4))
> > > > +#define TPM_I2C_DID_VID(l) (0x0006 | ((l) << 4))
> > > > +
> > > > +struct priv_data {
> > > > + int irq;
> > > > + int locality;
> > > > + struct completion tpm_ready;
> > > > + u8 buf[CR50_MAX_BUFSIZE];
> > > > +};
> > >
> > > tpm_i2c_cr50_priv_data
> > >
> > > > +
> > > > +enum force_release {
> > > > + CR50_NO_FORCE = 0x0,
> > > > + CR50_FORCE = 0x1,
> > > > +};
> > >
> > > I'd just
> > >
> > > #define TPM_I2C_CR50_NO_FORCE 0
> > > #define TPM_I2C_CR50_FORCE 1
> > >
> >
> > A proper enumerated type has advantages over a preprocessor macro:
> > even if the compiler won't warn you, static analyzers can warn
> > about a misuse.
>
> Why don't you just use "bool", "true" and "false"? I ignored that
> this has nothing to do with the hardware last time.
>
Well, boolean parameters are a known anti-pattern [1].
[1] https://people.mpi-inf.mpg.de/~jblanche/api-design.pdf
Powered by blists - more mailing lists